All one needs to look at is the difference in writing style/tone in those two articles.
Lawrence Abrams (who I happen to know, and well) is factual and dispassionate. He doesn't get in to throwing around pure speculative opinion such as, "The update has been a mess, so pushing it to users does little to inspire confidence on the back of
other deceptions. Microsoft is also in a race to patch
new wormable vulnerabilities and
Visual Basic issues which hit every version of Windows 10.
Right now, Microsoft needs to inspire trust. It has a long way to go."
Nor does he pull in ancient history from other KB updates that are utterly unrelated to the issue he's reporting on.
Like I said, I don't rely on Forbes for technology reporting (and not just on Windows). This single article, when compared against other reporting on the same issue, is a clear indicator as to why I don't.
You can call me a Microsoft fan boy if you wish, but that would not be accurate (and check out my body of posts on Bleeping Computer to see that, as when Microsoft did the clearly bone-headed I yelled as loud as anyone else does. I just refuse to blame Microsoft for every problem, because many that occur are not of their making).