Based on that information, you could build an AMD version that's roughly on part with an 860k and an R7 265 or R7 270.
But why would you?
As far as 'better', you just step up each component.
A better GPU is easily measurable. A 'better' CPU depends on what you use it for.
For gaming, an i5 is generally better than an i3 (with it's 'true' 4 cores), an i7 (4core + HT) and a Xeon (4/6core + HT) are usually overkill.
AMD has 4, 6 & 8 core options, but their single core performance doesn't always stack up well in gaming. Considering the majority of games don't take advantage of any more than 2 cores, having a 6 or 8 core not running as efficiently as a quad-core i5 doesn't make too much sense.
They're all viable options, but it boils...