New SSD slower than expected?

whoisme555

Distinguished
May 24, 2010
221
0
18,680
I bought an 80 GB vertex 2 SSD a couple weeks ago and it seems to be running slower than I had expected. I have windows 7 installed on it and I have 2 other 1 TB hard drives. I just changed it to ACHI mode in bios but it really doesn't run much faster than my caviar black for some reason.

Using HD tune and a 1MB block size, the vertex 2 is getting an average speed of 139.1 MB/S, minimum 120ish max of 170ish, access time of .2 ms, burst rate of 89.8 MB/s

The caviar black had an average of 89.9, Max of 110.1 decreasing almost linearly to a minimum of 54.8, access time of 12.2 ms, burst rate of 134.4

I was under the impression, however, that the vertex 2 would be an average speed of at least 200+ MB/s, and I've seen plenty of people post those speeds, what kind of tweaks should I be doing to increase the speed of the vertex drive?

Let me add that the drive was set to IDE mode and I changed it to ACHI, downloaded the drivers and restarted less than an hour ago. This benchmark was run 5 minutes ago. Could the TRIM just not have had enough time to kick in and work yet?
 

tecmo34

Administrator
Moderator

whoisme555

Distinguished
May 24, 2010
221
0
18,680
Part number is OCZSSD2-2VTX80G, is that 25 nm or 34nm?

bench.png
 

tecmo34

Administrator
Moderator
1... Based on your screenshot, you have the 34nm, as the 25nm has an "E" in the last digits.

2... You are still showing in IDE mode, as it shows pciide instead of msachi or the appropriate SATA controller. Have you confirmed you are actually in AHCI.
 

whoisme555

Distinguished
May 24, 2010
221
0
18,680
It's only SATA II? It must've been the C300 (my other option) that was SATA III.

How poor are Marvell's drivers compared to Intel's? Moving the drive involves taking out my video card and moving my stuff around because the cable is connected in a very inconvenient place, but if it's worth the change then I will gladly do it.

I changed the controller and it is now significantly faster.

bench2.png


I greatly appreciate all your help so far :love:
 

whoisme555

Distinguished
May 24, 2010
221
0
18,680


Well then I'll swap it over a little later, thank you so much, you've been incredibly helpful
 

vegettonox

Distinguished
Oct 11, 2006
617
0
19,060
sata 3 is backwards compatible with sata 2 so regardless of the port its not a big issue but i have a gigabyte board with a similar raid setup and the marvel controller showed roughly 50Mbps slower speeds than the similar intel raid controller. I will say this much do not raid high speed ssds on sata 2 connections as you will bottleneck them, i had roughly 280 mbps on a raid until i moved them to the sata 3 ports and raided them my speeds jumped to 550Mbps read and write speeds with write cache on.
 

whoisme555

Distinguished
May 24, 2010
221
0
18,680


Well that's interesting... Within the next few days I'll switch the drive over, I'll post back if there are better results just in case anyone else was curious :p
 

whoisme555

Distinguished
May 24, 2010
221
0
18,680
Overclocked my computer, switched the drive to sata II, installed Intel RS 10 drivers and a couple other things. I don't know how much was affected, but there was some increase in speed according to benchmarks. Also, I have a feeling it was the overclock, but it's noticeably faster :)

2.png