Archived from groups: alt.games.video.nintendo.gameboy.advance (
More info?)
"Eric" <none@nospam.not> schreef in bericht
news:10rspvrhclq8425@corp.supernews.com...
>
>> Providers like Vodafone and ISP's are promoting Wi-fi more and more over
>> here... But with UMTS having far more coverage here, it's more likely
>> UMTS
>> will be the next wireless platform of the future, rather than wi-fi, as
> this
>> costs more for the providers - being a loss-loss situation, correct me if
>> I'm wrong, though.
>
> Oh, I'm not attempting to classify 802.11 as a general wireless internet
> solution, rather than just a niche LAN solution...
>
> UMTS.. Honestly, I haven't followed any of the cell technologies for a
> few
> years now. Is UMTS's lineage based upon CDMA or GSM? From a quick
> google,
> I just seen that UMTS is also refered to "W-CDMA", but also read a passage
> saying it was a follow-up to GSM/GPRS..
>
> Many years ago, I had worked with CDMA (SSMA) equipment in the US
> military -- years before it made an appearance in the commercial world.
> From various inherent limitations I saw with CDMA, I thought GSM would be
> a
> better commercial solution. Of course, later the US would move primarily
> towards CDMA while Europe went with GSM...
>
> -Eric
>
>
It's actually seen as the GPRS follow-up. Through UMTS it's possible to
stream and download files through a much higher speed than GPRS. This makes
it possible, for example, to use video telephony and watch TV on your phone.
Anyway, we'll see if wi-fi will be this successful... Things are usually
inferior to the mass, and I s'pose GSM/GPRS/UMTS will still be the most
widely used data-network in Europe.