HI,
I have been wondering for all these years if both Nvidia and AMD follow some kind of sales strategy by lowering the Core clocks and shader clocks in new GPUS.
I would expect as the technology grows, things should only get better.
For example once we achieved core clock 1000MHZ and mem bandwidth of 150GB/s then for the same price or more it should only be better meaning at least 1000MHZ and 150gb/s with additional features and nothing less.
for example:
1. http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=670&card2=641
nvidia 560ti : more shader clock = more pixel fill rate
nvidia 660ti : everything more but shader clock is less
2. http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=635&card2=638
radeon 6870: more core clock, more shader clock,
radeon 6970: less core clock , less shader clock
I just wish to understand if its some strategy or really technologically challenging.
Thanks!
I have been wondering for all these years if both Nvidia and AMD follow some kind of sales strategy by lowering the Core clocks and shader clocks in new GPUS.
I would expect as the technology grows, things should only get better.
For example once we achieved core clock 1000MHZ and mem bandwidth of 150GB/s then for the same price or more it should only be better meaning at least 1000MHZ and 150gb/s with additional features and nothing less.
for example:
1. http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=670&card2=641
nvidia 560ti : more shader clock = more pixel fill rate
nvidia 660ti : everything more but shader clock is less
2. http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=635&card2=638
radeon 6870: more core clock, more shader clock,
radeon 6970: less core clock , less shader clock
I just wish to understand if its some strategy or really technologically challenging.
Thanks!