Interesting news.
http://nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=IO_20030409_7420
I don't like the looks of this. Worst case scenario: Nvidia/Ea program the games to run slower, or buggier on an ATI. I can see it now. when benchmarking a r400 vs a nv 35, in future mark 2003, the r400 makes 40000 compared to nvidia's 450 points. But, when you put in Madden 2004, the ATI card gets 5 frames/sec while the nvidia card gets 500000.
Hmmmm, if nvidia is going this route, then maby ATI should partner up with valve (Half-life 2), and John Carmack (Doom 3).
Either way, I don't have a good feeling about this, and just becuase nvidia did this, I'm going to go and buy an ATI card now.
http://nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=IO_20030409_7420
I don't like the looks of this. Worst case scenario: Nvidia/Ea program the games to run slower, or buggier on an ATI. I can see it now. when benchmarking a r400 vs a nv 35, in future mark 2003, the r400 makes 40000 compared to nvidia's 450 points. But, when you put in Madden 2004, the ATI card gets 5 frames/sec while the nvidia card gets 500000.
Hmmmm, if nvidia is going this route, then maby ATI should partner up with valve (Half-life 2), and John Carmack (Doom 3).
Either way, I don't have a good feeling about this, and just becuase nvidia did this, I'm going to go and buy an ATI card now.