Review Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super Review: Ti-Like Performance for Less

I don't know if I've ever seen a TH graphics card review that had such few cards being compared. Leaving out the 1660 non-super seems odd, as does the lack of RX 590 (and 580). Even a Vega 56 would have been a good addition IMO.
I think it's because of the new testing platform, thus the results on the new platform don't correspond correctly with the results from the previous platform?
 
Reactions: TJ Hooker
I'm actually relieved to find out that it actually uses about the same, or slightly less power, than the 1660Ti. It seems like the 120W rating of the 1660Ti was slightly understated, and the 125W rating of the 1660 Super is about spot on. Maybe the 1660Ti should've been listed with a 130W rating?

In any case, it does seem like the performance/price lands solidly in favor of the Super, and they're about tied in efficiency.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS