News Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Rumored to Have a 165W TDP

[Admin]

Nvidia's VRAM bumped version of the RTX 4060 Ti is expected to have a TDP of 165W, which is 5W more than the 8GB version.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Rumored to Have a 165W TDP : Read more

 

[PlaneInTheSky]

Where is the RX 7600 with 16GB VRAM AMD? Big talk from AMD about having more VRAM on $700 GPU, but when it comes to mainstream GPU, AMD is shortchanging consumers.

 

[atomicWAR]

Where is the RX 7600 with 16GB VRAM AMD? Big talk from AMD about having more VRAM on $700 GPU, but when it comes to mainstream GPU, AMD is shortchanging consumers.

We agree! Awesome.

Yeah 12GB needs to be the new minimum if you ask me. 8GB cards are just getting to dated at 1080P. 16GB will soon be needed at even 1080P (arguably now in some fringe cases).

 

[digitalgriffin]

Dead in the water at this price at anything over $350 for 8gb.

 

[Amdlova]

165w 16gb not bad but what price? The bandwith is too low for asking 500us for it max 350

 

[Ogotai]

AMD is shortchanging consumers.

like nvidia is doing with this and other cards that arent 4080or 4090 ????

 

[PlaneInTheSky]

like nvidia is doing with this and other cards that arent 4080or 4090

Sure, but with the 4060 Ti we will finally have a "mainstream" card with 16GB of VRAM (pending rumours).

AMD made all this hoopla about their cards having more VRAM, but now they're about to launch an RX 7600 with only 8GB VRAM. What's up with that.

 

[Ogotai]

its pathetic that they are releasing a card that has more ram, then a higher tier card. it should be the other way around,the 4070 should have 16, and this card, 12. the lower you go the less ram it should have, but now, no lower then 8

 

[Metal Messiah.]

Similarly, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and RTX 4060 16GB models are tipped for a July release.

Correct you ADA table and this particular line. There is NO 16GB RTX 4060 (non-Ti) version planned and/or is in Nvidia's roadmap, as of now. The RTX 4060 8GB is tipped for a later July release, not 16GB.

 

[sherhi]

its pathetic that they are releasing a card that has more ram, then a higher tier card. it should be the other way around,the 4070 should have 16, and this card, 12. the lower you go the less ram it should have, but now, no lower then 8

It's more pathetic they make extra ram a selling point and charging premium for it, it just shows that extra GPU power outside of ram is not that appealing to consumers to pay for it.

It's up to consumers whether they tolerate it or not, car manufacturers in my country once tried to make "manual air-conditioning" a feature in a "special pack" with other useless things and asked good 20% extra of full price of a car...it did not last long. They are still trying this BS with regular cruise control, some 80+ years old tech...

 

[Roland Of Gilead]

So, the 4060ti comes with less cuda cores than a 3060ti, along with a reduced bus witdh!! I don't see how this GPU get's well ahead of the 3060i too much. Can a refined process give the lift needed over last gen, with lesser bandwidth and cores? Meh!

 

[hannibal]

So, the 4060ti comes with less cuda cores than a 3060ti, along with a reduced bus witdh!! I don't see how this GPU get's well ahead of the 3060i too much. Can a refined process give the lift needed over last gen, with lesser bandwidth and cores? Meh!

More cache...
But yeah.. the difference most likely is not big. The low end 1080p gaming is stagnated and will remain stagnated.

 

[edzieba]

It's more pathetic they make extra ram a selling point and charging premium for it, it just shows that extra GPU power outside of ram is not that appealing to consumers to pay for it.

Hey, if there are people who want to ignore real-world performance testing and just want Bigger Number Make GPU More Betterer printed on the box, why not charge them for giving them what they want? AMD are even paying for Nvidia's marketing in that regard.