nVidia horsepower

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

No flames, no them -vs- us posts.

Which nVidia DX9 card, has at least the same horsepower as an ATI Radeon
9500pro.

I use both ATI and nVidia , and dont buy into one-better-then-the-other
posts. I like both companies.

Just dont like both companies marketing (model number) stratagies. True card
horsepower gets lost in the schemes.

Thanks...

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

"Sept1967" <sept1967@highstream.(Erase)net> wrote in message
news:1085es180ia2g4a@corp.supernews.com...
> No flames, no them -vs- us posts.
>
> Which nVidia DX9 card, has at least the same horsepower as an ATI Radeon
> 9500pro.
>
> Just dont like both companies marketing (model number) stratagies. True
card
> horsepower gets lost in the schemes.

To match the ATi 9500Pro in DX9 - the FX5700Ultra or the FX5900XT will get
you in the ballpark.

In non-DX9 applications, the Ti4600 would be the closest, but the 9500Pro
would have mostly better performance depending on the settings and drivers.

Tim

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

I already have a 9500Pro in my AMS SFF (P4 2.4GHz)
And I have an MSI ti4200 8x AGP in my Barton 2600+. That was the video card
I was looking to bump down to another system, to get a faster DX 9 card in
with the AMD.

I heard the 5700u fans sound like a dustbuster, and was loking towards a
5900xt.
The 5600's looked alittle weak (as an upgrade from a ti4200).


"t thome" <t_thome@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1vzgc.16948$Yf6.7336@fed1read07...
> "Sept1967" <sept1967@highstream.(Erase)net> wrote in message
> news:1085es180ia2g4a@corp.supernews.com...
> > No flames, no them -vs- us posts.
> >
> > Which nVidia DX9 card, has at least the same horsepower as an ATI Radeon
> > 9500pro.
> >
> > Just dont like both companies marketing (model number) stratagies. True
> card
> > horsepower gets lost in the schemes.
>
> To match the ATi 9500Pro in DX9 - the FX5700Ultra or the FX5900XT will get
> you in the ballpark.
>
> In non-DX9 applications, the Ti4600 would be the closest, but the 9500Pro
> would have mostly better performance depending on the settings and
drivers.
>
> Tim
>
>

 

[wookie]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Here is a comparison done @ Tom's .. between a TI 4200 and 4400.

http://www20.tomshardware.com/graphic/20021202/radeon_9500-06.html


"Sept1967" <sept1967@highstream.(Erase)net> wrote in message
news:1085es180ia2g4a@corp.supernews.com...
> No flames, no them -vs- us posts.
>
> Which nVidia DX9 card, has at least the same horsepower as an ATI Radeon
> 9500pro.
>
> I use both ATI and nVidia , and dont buy into one-better-then-the-other
> posts. I like both companies.
>
> Just dont like both companies marketing (model number) stratagies. True
card
> horsepower gets lost in the schemes.
>
> Thanks...
>
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

{cough} DX 9 cards...


"Wookie" <Tom@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Qzzgc.21058$0b4.26655@attbi_s51...
> Here is a comparison done @ Tom's .. between a TI 4200 and 4400.
>
> http://www20.tomshardware.com/graphic/20021202/radeon_9500-06.html
>
>
> "Sept1967" <sept1967@highstream.(Erase)net> wrote in message
> news:1085es180ia2g4a@corp.supernews.com...
> > No flames, no them -vs- us posts.
> >
> > Which nVidia DX9 card, has at least the same horsepower as an ATI Radeon
> > 9500pro.
> >
> > I use both ATI and nVidia , and dont buy into one-better-then-the-other
> > posts. I like both companies.
> >
> > Just dont like both companies marketing (model number) stratagies. True
> card
> > horsepower gets lost in the schemes.
> >
> > Thanks...
> >
> >
> >
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

"Sept1967" <sept1967@highstream.(Erase)net> wrote in message
news:1085es180ia2g4a@corp.supernews.com...
> No flames, no them -vs- us posts.
>
> Which nVidia DX9 card, has at least the same horsepower as an ATI Radeon
> 9500pro.
>
> I use both ATI and nVidia , and dont buy into one-better-then-the-other
> posts. I like both companies.
>
> Just dont like both companies marketing (model number) stratagies. True
card
> horsepower gets lost in the schemes.
>
> Thanks...
>
>
>

I Myself have a Radeon 9500 non-pro with the extra pipelines enabled - but
no 256bit memory interface - so effectively, its a 64mb Radeon 9500 pro. I
get a decent 3dMark 01 score - and would compare it to a GeForce 4 Ti4400
easily - although i suspect it'd also urinate from a great height over the
FX5600.

HardOCP has benchmarks with the R300 based 9500 vs the GeForce 4's - and
while the GeForce 4's and the Radeon 9500 are neck and neck in the regular
test - once AA and AF are turned on - the Radeon eliminates them. Total
annihilation!

Its a very good card and serves me well. Also - its got better DX9 features
(IMO) than the GeForce FX's.

to recap - at least as fast as a GeForce FX5600 if not moreso.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Sept1967 wrote:

> {cough} DX 9 cards...

http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/20031229/index.html

Includes 9500 and FX series.

--
Error reading sig - A)bort R)etry I)nfluence with large hammer