Nvidia Intros New GeForce 700M Mobile GPU Series

Status
Not open for further replies.

ipwn3r456

Honorable
Mar 21, 2012
851
0
11,060
26
Comeon Nvidia, I am pretty sure everyone is more excited on the desktop GPUs instead of mobile GPUs. Give us some news about Geforce 700 series desktop cards!
 

A Bad Day

Distinguished
Nov 25, 2011
2,256
0
19,790
2
[citation][nom]joytech22[/nom]Why don't they ever release their high-end with their low-mid range stuff?This is why I'm still on a 7970M.[/citation]

Because it's easier to rebrand stuff than to print the new silicon dies.
 

A Bad Day

Distinguished
Nov 25, 2011
2,256
0
19,790
2
EDIT: BTW, Nividia and AMD are both guilty of the rebranding.

"Dude, what do you mean the 610m is actually a slightly higher clocked 520m? And that the 420m creams both 610m and 520m? Isn't 610 is higher than 420?"
 
[citation][nom]A Bad Day[/nom]EDIT: BTW, Nividia and AMD are both guilty of the rebranding."Dude, what do you mean the 610m is actually a slightly higher clocked 520m? And that the 420m creams both 610m and 520m? Isn't 610 is higher than 420?"[/citation]
GT420 > GT520 > GT620

Hup dup.
 

bustapr

Distinguished
Jan 23, 2009
1,613
0
19,780
0
[citation][nom]joytech22[/nom]Why don't they ever release their high-end with their low-mid range stuff?This is why I'm still on a 7970M.[/citation]
lol you make that sounds like its old and bad
 

boytitan2

Honorable
Oct 16, 2012
96
0
10,630
0
GeForce Experience lol ya no ones gona use that as of now it sucks. Hopefully this means the desktop 7 series is coming soon.
 

alidan

Splendid
Aug 5, 2009
5,303
0
25,780
0
yea, 90fps in starcraft 2, yes you can do amazeing things with a gpu once you reduce the graphics in a game to nothing.

hell im sure i got tf2 to run off a 3 core amd laptop with intergrated (non apu) graphics to about 60fps when i reduced the graphics to next to nothing hand decreased the resolution a bit too.
 

Murissokah

Distinguished
Aug 12, 2007
1,319
22
19,665
136
Will they do the GTX 300s thing again? Release a rebranded product just for notebooks, then call the next-gen desktop part GTX 800s? That makes you feel like your card went from flagship to two generations behind in a metter of months.
 

hitman40

Distinguished
Sep 13, 2010
95
0
18,630
0
I say stop making these things more powerful and start making these things require little to passive cooling. I mean come on, who the hell wants a powerhouse when your gonna hear the fans of your laptop at their loudest settings even with headphones on?
 

gsxrme

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2009
253
0
18,780
0
The methods of branding from AMD and Nvidia should be illegal.

The GTX680m is NOT a GTX680 but more so a down clocked GTX670. If AMD or Nvidia want to release a mobile badge then the pipelines on the GTX680m should match the GTX680. Nvidia can always lower the core and memory frequency to lower voltage requirements.

If Either companies can't get a 680 to work at those settings then maybe they should call it a damn 680m. MAYBE they should just call it a damn 670m as their top end mobile GPU. The people who truely understand this are the ones who got a $2200 notebook with a 680m, thinking they'll get playable frame rates just like their desktop 680 in Crysis 3 ultra and go find out it completely sucks.

Oh wait, I am one of those people. SCREW YOU AMD, NVIDIA mobile branding. We should SUE you!

(680m spec)
Core count: 1344
GPU clock: 720mhz
Memory interface: 256bit

(670 spec)
Core count: 1344
GPU clock: 915
Memory interface: 256bit

(680 spec)
Core count: 1536
GPU clock: 1006
Memory interface: 256bit

Do away with all the "M" tags! Intel and AMD CPUs are just as bad. Intel will release a mobile i5 CPU and your not getting a quadcore but more so a dualcore with Hyperthreading, >_>
 
Sep 15, 2012
45
0
10,540
1
[citation][nom]gsxrme[/nom]The methods of branding from AMD and Nvidia should be illegal. The GTX680m is NOT a GTX680 but more so a down clocked GTX670. If AMD or Nvidia want to release a mobile badge then the pipelines on the GTX680m should match the GTX680. Nvidia can always lower the core and memory frequency to lower voltage requirements.If Either companies can't get a 680 to work at those settings then maybe they should call it a damn 680m. MAYBE they should just call it a damn 670m as their top end mobile GPU. The people who truely understand this are the ones who got a $2200 notebook with a 680m, thinking they'll get playable frame rates just like their desktop 680 in Crysis 3
ultra and go find out it completely sucks.Oh wait, I am one of those people. SCREW YOU AMD, NVIDIA mobile branding. We should SUE you!(680m spec)Core count: 1344GPU clock: 720mhzMemory interface: 256bit(670 spec)Core count: 1344GPU clock: 915Memory interface: 256bit(680 spec)Core count: 1536GPU clock: 1006Memory interface: 256bitDo away with all the "M" tags! Intel and AMD CPUs are just as bad. Intel will release a mobile i5 CPU and your not getting a quadcore but more so a dualcore with Hyperthreading, >_>[/citation]


The GTX 680MX should have been the 680M and the 680M should have been the 670M... A Titan Mobile should be as fast as a desktop 680 since the 680mx is already approximately as fast as a 660Ti.
 
"There is an elegant simplicity to Nvidia's GeForce 700M notebook technologies," said Rene Haas, vice president and general manager of the notebook business unit at Nvidia. "You use your notebook how you want, and GeForce makes your experience awesome."

Now that's good advertising.
 

tim1935

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
60
0
18,630
0
It always worries me when the main selling points are all of these "marketing buzzwords". I love my laptop gaming, I haven't touched my desktop in years. But there is a lot of deception they way they market these products sometimes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS