Your latest graphics card roundup lists key benchmarks for the number of shaders, texture units, ROPs, etc. But the Nvidia Quadro cards, touted as serious, specialized workstation cards, list *different* major differentiators, such as memory bandwidth, number of cuda cores, etc.
So how can we compare the performance? Especially interested in video hd rendering and editing.
I bought a Quadro 600 (with 96 cuda cores) and it seems to be low end performer, not my expected hot, new econo ($150) card.
So, how to compare the performance of these two series of cards.
For example, a GeForce 560, HD 6970, etc., vs. a Quardo card, such as a 600, 2000 or 4000 ???
Thanks,
MM
So how can we compare the performance? Especially interested in video hd rendering and editing.
I bought a Quadro 600 (with 96 cuda cores) and it seems to be low end performer, not my expected hot, new econo ($150) card.
So, how to compare the performance of these two series of cards.
For example, a GeForce 560, HD 6970, etc., vs. a Quardo card, such as a 600, 2000 or 4000 ???
Thanks,
MM