News Nvidia Reportedly Prepping RTX 4060 with 16GB of VRAM

Nvidia is reportedly readying a yet another GeForce RTX 4060 model, the non-Ti RTX 4060 with 16GB of memory

Your article is misleading. Nvidia is NOT prepping a 16GB non-TI variant. It's just that the 16 GB RTX 4060 Ti has a different PCB and board design.

Please read Vidoecardz's article again. They are talking about the Ti SKU, not non-Ti.

They got hold of the 16GB specs for the graphics card and it looks exactly the same as the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB.

We are getting a slightly different AD103-351 GPU that will be fitted on the PG190 SKU 363/361 board. AD106-350 GPU is being used by the 8GB SKU.

As usual this new GPU will house 34 SMs with 4352 cores, 32 MB of L2 cache, and a 128-bit bus interface that supports 16 GB memory at speeds of 18 Gbps for up to 288 GB/s bandwidth.

While the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB graphics card retains the same chip, it looks like the dual-density memory modules will require a little bit more power. The standard 8 GB model has a TDP of 160W and the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB will operate with a reference 165W TDP.

That's all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wait, but this would put a 16gb 4060 against an 8gb RX 7600...Would be so glorious if AMD didn't make a 16gb 7600 and have their criticism backfire again...

SAPPHIRE-RX-7600-HERO-BANNER.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedBear87
While the Specs are still <Mod Edit>, this is very sensible, no sensible purchaser should be paying $400+ for a 8GB GPU in 2023, at least the 4060 will have a decent lifespan, whereas 8GB cards will be struggling to play lots of new titles.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: FunSurfer
My 1650 has 192gb/s that 280gb/s will be great for 1920x1080 gaming.
Long time ago the graphics have 384 bit bus in extreme some graphics achieved 512 bits. But today give to you a 128 bits and says banana to you.
 
They must've seen the benchmarks on games with 8 GB vs 16 GB even at 1080p. This is the least they could do, and should be the only card recommended for those that might want newer games.
 
Again, as mentioned on the FIRST post here, Nvidia is NOT, NOT, prepping a 16GB non-TI model. This article should be removed from TH because it's completely nonsense and is in no way related to the information in the videocardz article. They are talking about a 16GB ti model and they say that. The ONLY place it is mistakenly identified as a non-TI model is in the title and that is simply a typo, which any credible journalist would have verified against the information that's actually IN the article, which itself, is ONLY a rumor anyhow.

I'm sorry, but things just get shadier and shadier around here as time goes on. Editors need to vet articles better than this.
 
Again, as mentioned on the FIRST post here, Nvidia is NOT, NOT, prepping a 16GB non-TI model. This article should be removed from TH because it's completely nonsense and is in no way related to the information in the videocardz article. They are talking about a 16GB ti model and they say that. The ONLY place it is mistakenly identified as a non-TI model is in the title and that is simply a typo, which any credible journalist would have verified against the information that's actually IN the article, which itself, is ONLY a rumor anyhow.

I'm sorry, but things just get shadier and shadier around here as time goes on. Editors need to vet articles better than this.

Why don't they proof-read the articles before publishing it online though ? I think the article has still not been looked into or edited in any form. It is HIGHLY misleading to say the least.