Back at you. Fully agree... side note loved Robocop.
Frame gen is a last resort technology. It works mostly, to smooth things out in a pinch. But if your not hitting 100-120fps bare minimum with it on, you end up a blurry gross image that has so much lag it becomes unplayable. And even those numbers are engine specific. Anything UE I need to hit 144fps for there to be a chance of a smooth(ish) experience (cough still probably stutters cough cough). Give me Tech 8 and if I am above 100 FPS with FG and everything is golden. Plus even when the input lag is bareable, you wouldn't want to use it on an competitive game regardless of how Nvidia spins it.
I get frustrated with the input lag of x2 as a 4090 user. I can't imagine x4 MFG. It would have to feel like an old TV using frame interpolation on out of game mode to hit 240hz achieving the soap opera effect. I have seen some benchmarks where latency barely increases in select games but they seem to be the exception and not the rule. .43ms or higher didn't seem uncommon for x4 MFG. No thank you 120-144 fps is plenty. Until frame gen is latency free (never happen) or at least cost less than .05-.1 ms, I don't see it being the big deal Nvidia claims it to be.