^ :lol: CUDA would be a plus only if more software uses it. From a developer's perspective I think programing for CUDA is easier than programing for ATI.
All this is aimed more at industry, which is great, but doesn't do a huge amount for most people.
Like to see what they are going more on a the game front of things. This is more like Quadro stuff (yes I know they use it on both but most of these tasks are done on Quadro cards)
Hmmmm.... to me, it bodes poorly that all they talked about was CUDA, seems like GT300 is either too far out to demonstrate or not powerful enough to show up what AMD delivered.
^ :lol: CUDA would be a plus only if more software uses it. From a developer's perspective I think programing for CUDA is easier than programing for ATI.
i agree, especially since i moved to ati and do stream computing now (oh the joys of knowing CUDA as well)
though i am waiting for ATI's OpenCL SDK for GPUS's, they released it for their cpus though
No jenny, it would be a lose lose. We need at least two major competitors in every industry to push each other to improve speed and quality. Monopolies run just slightly more efficiently and responsively than government agencies.