Nvidia Touts (Quiet) 'Fastest DX11 GPU on Planet!'

Status
Not open for further replies.

IM0001

Distinguished
Dec 4, 2006
104
0
18,680
Just a rehashed 480 with more performance "unlocked" from the drivers.
Still will be interesting if the cooling and performance pan out, and look forward to the battle between it and the 69XX series.
 

restatement3dofted

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2010
477
2
18,790
Hope that bad boy's adequately sealed - dropping the cash for the then-fastest DX11 GPU on the market, only to have its water chamber leak onto the rest of your $2000+ system would make for a bad day.
 

wintermint

Distinguished
Sep 30, 2009
1,150
0
19,460
Frankly, I don't care whether AMD or nVidia has the fastest GPU... I'm more concern about the price drops that will follow suit after new and better products come out :D
 

nevertell

Distinguished
Oct 18, 2009
335
0
18,780
So now you'll be able to boil water for your tea while playing crysis.

I think they should fight the temperatures at the source- reducing power usage.


Anyway, nvidia is the way I'll go, since ATI/AMD has s#itdrivers for linux.
 

joebob2000

Distinguished
Sep 20, 2006
788
0
18,980
This sounds like the same thing Shuttle designed into their XPC line like 10 years ago, and cpu/gpu cooler makers have been toying with ever since. Except instead of water, they use a pressurized refrigerant with more ideal phase-change properties to move heat faster and to not pose a hazard if it ever leaked. How is this any different from one of those systems?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Nothing new with the vapor chamber, ATI used it in the 2000 series and I am sure they were not first do so either.
 

N.Broekhuijsen

Distinguished
Jun 17, 2009
3,098
0
20,860
"It's a MILLION times better then the old GTX480! Although, thats not saying much since other things that were a MILLION times better then the old GTX480 included syphilis, and tuberculosis... and things like being on fire!"

Perfect Description! Tell me if you know where this is from!
 

xaed

Distinguished
Nov 8, 2010
18
0
18,510
Can someone correct me if I'm wrong?

How is that gonna cool anything? Won't the condensed water just run into the hot water that's on its way up? Then just head back up again?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Wait , wait wait ... Am I the only one that is getting a deja vu here . He says its a brand new termal solution !!! Come on . here is a link that ati was testing it back in 2008 : http://www.tomshardware.com/news/radeon-4870-4850-cooler,6523.html.
 

zak_mckraken

Distinguished
Jan 16, 2004
1,592
0
19,780
[citation][nom]xaed[/nom]Can someone correct me if I'm wrong?How is that gonna cool anything? Won't the condensed water just run into the hot water that's on its way up? Then just head back up again?[/citation]
Pretty much, yes. Not only that, but water boils at 100°C (212°F). I'm not sure I want my GPU to get that hot.
 
Sapphire had a Vapor-X version of the HD 4850 in 2008, IIRC, using this technology. I guess it's mature enough to be trusted by now.

47dB is excellent news IMO. My trusty old 8800GTX is rated at 61 dB under load, and it's several times weaker than the GTX 480.
 

IzzyCraft

Distinguished
Nov 20, 2008
1,438
0
19,290
[citation][nom]IM0001[/nom]Just a rehashed 480 with more performance "unlocked" from the drivers.Still will be interesting if the cooling and performance pan out, and look forward to the battle between it and the 69XX series.[/citation]
It's likely a slightly redesigned GF100 similar to a less gpgpu heavy version like the GF104 it's why all rumors point to a GF110 instead of GF100b. In other words this is frankly no different then what amd does from year to year, just tweak what you have don't necessarily make a new chip.

[quotemsg=9255281,9,56305]47db is not what I would consider quiet.[/quotemsg]
It is for a gpu under heavy load, most high end gpus would do worse then this.

This kind of cooling has been used for heat pipes, all a vapor chamber is is just a flat heatpipe.

[quotemsg=9255292,15,88617]Sapphire has been using vapor cooling for a while using Vapor-X on the (old) ATI's...[/quotemsg]
The technology has been around for much longer then that. It's just a matter of cost and performance.
 

xaed

Distinguished
Nov 8, 2010
18
0
18,510
[citation][nom]zak_mckraken[/nom]Pretty much, yes. Not only that, but water boils at 100°C (212°F). I'm not sure I want my GPU to get that hot.[/citation]

Figures, thanks.
 
[quotemsg=9255297,18,29801]Pretty much, yes. Not only that, but water boils at 100°C (212°F). I'm not sure I want my GPU to get that hot.[/quotemsg]
Not if it's in a vacuum it doesn't, at 260mb the boiling point is about 69°C.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts