Nvidia's 9600GT reviewed!!

nzxtlexa

Distinguished
Oct 23, 2007
332
0
18,780
Yes pretty impressive considering its price. In Crysis @ 1600 x 1200 its almost at the same level of a 8800gt. I'm still hanging on for the 9800 GX2 though! Lets hope the price is as good!
 

spoonboy

Distinguished
Oct 31, 2007
1,053
0
19,280
Theres something slightly 'iffy' about that review me feels. Put it this way, the 8800gt looks a bit pointless now in comparison, how does a 4 ROP card do that??

Hats of too tweaktown though for moving to a more current set of games, and full version ones not just demos aswell.
 

zenmaster

Splendid
Feb 21, 2006
3,867
0
22,790
Remember, the results are from a slightly OC'd 9600GT vs a Stock 8800GT card.

Also, this card will only be about $20-$30 less than the 8800GT.
($180MSRP I read someplace, but who knows what that will really mean.)

This is a new core (G94) so some improvement is to be expected.
The place it likely puts the 8800GT is to be replaced by the 9800GT at some point not too far in the future.
 

marvelous211

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
1,153
0
19,280


It's actually 16 rops. That program doesn't recognize new chips.

9600gt has everthing a G92 8800gts has minus 64 SP.
 

homerdog

Distinguished
Apr 16, 2007
1,700
0
19,780
They used the new 17X drivers for the 9600GT which supposedly perform a good bit better than the 169s. An apples to apples comparison this is not.

They also claim that the OC'd card has a slower than stock shader clock :??:
 

spoonboy

Distinguished
Oct 31, 2007
1,053
0
19,280
tweaktown is a bit iffy in general, but its quick at getting news and reviews out. Either way the differernce 64 shaders makes in the 8800gt appears to be pretty poo, so I'd like to see some more reviews.

Anyway looks like a good card.
 

caamsa

Distinguished
Apr 25, 2006
1,830
0
19,810



I agree with the hats off for using a more current set of games for testing. Maybe Tom's will get the hint and finally update their VGA charts to current games as well.