Nvidia's Future GPUs Will Be Kepler, Then Maxwell

Status
Not open for further replies.

liveonc

Distinguished
Mar 24, 2008
437
0
18,780
[citation][nom]amk09[/nom]Performance/watt improvements sure... but what about price/performance? That's what i'm more interested in.[/citation]

price/performance? So you can save $100 & wind up paying $100 a month in electricity on that super gaming rig? What will laptop owners say when their laptop on has 30 minutes of battery life even though it uses a 12 Cell battery?
 

scrumworks

Distinguished
May 22, 2009
361
0
18,780
[citation][nom]joytech22[/nom]Even though Nvidia's behind at the moment, at least they know what they're doing.[/citation]

They know how to do nice powerpoint presentations.
 

ares1214

Splendid
This isnt all that impressive for a die shrink. Also even less so considering they had to show it in watts/performance to make fermi look worse, and in relation the others look better. Fermi in 2009...well...
 

Cy-Kill

Distinguished
Mar 9, 2010
232
0
18,690
I remember reading back in 2008, I think, that nVIDIA was going to start using MIMD for their GPUs, what happened to that plan? As they said, it would bring their GPUs to the next level and leave ATi in the dust until ATi would come out with GPUs based on MIMD.
 

Kaiser_25

Distinguished
Jul 9, 2009
170
0
18,680
bah these roadmaps they get leaked is like..so uninformative...i wish they would give some kind of actual specs. Im not sure anyone cares that much for just the codenames...
 

ElMoIsEviL

Distinguished
Maxwell is likely going to be helped by a Department of Defense R&D contract that nVIDIA has been awarded as seen here: http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/display/20100810125334_U_S_Defense_Department_Grants_Nvidia_25_Million_to_Develop_Technologies_for_Exascale_Supercomputers.html

Keynesian Economics showcasing its superiority in terms of driving technological advancements once more. Keynesian tends to create revolutions while Mises and Friedman Economics (libertarian/laissez-faire) tends to bring evolutions.

Either way... very interesting.
 

ElMoIsEviL

Distinguished
Before anyone goes on a tangent about the evil's of Keynesian Economics... I am in no way endorsing Keynesian Economics.. simply pointing to one of the benefits.

The Internet, LCD, Satellite, Cell Phone etc tech all owes its start to Keynesian Economics (nearly any technological advancement really).
 

jfby

Distinguished
Jun 4, 2010
418
0
18,810
They may not have the exact specs, besides for marketing purposes you release a little at a time until it gets closer to the time of launch...
 

huron

Distinguished
Jun 4, 2007
2,420
0
19,860
I always wonder how close they are to having valid testing hardware when they do these presentations. I really want to know if they are just making educated guesses or if they actually have something working in the lab that shows similar info as they display in the powerpoint.

If not, I could make outlandish claims as well about future offerings.
 

The_Trutherizer

Distinguished
Jul 21, 2008
509
0
18,980
It is impressive. And as an ATI fan I do not say that lightly. But comments about price/performance are appropriate. NVidia seems to think the price/performance baseline was the 8800. Everything faster than that got more expensive even though one high end processor costs about as much to make as any other high end processor. I mean we can all appreciate performance, but only until it becomes affordable only to the type of people who drive around in Ferraris.
 

alidan

Splendid
Aug 5, 2009
5,303
0
25,780
you know the way i read this.

fermi uses a crap ton of power,
kepler will use less and provide more,
maxwell will use even less and provide even more,

im thinking that kepler will give ati a run for its money with watt to power,

and maxwell will do the exact same, but is a few years ahead of the game and they are exterminating mores law improving the cards 2.5X

[citation][nom]cy-kill[/nom]I remember reading back in 2008, I think, that nVIDIA was going to start using MIMD for their GPUs, what happened to that plan? As they said, it would bring their GPUs to the next level and leave ATi in the dust until ATi would come out with GPUs based on MIMD.[/citation]

now i may be wrong, but isn't that what fermi does? i didnt read the wiki but i skimmed it,
 

Cy-Kill

Distinguished
Mar 9, 2010
232
0
18,690
[citation][nom]alidan[/nom]

[citation][nom]cy-kill[/nom]I remember reading back in 2008, I think, that nVIDIA was going to start using MIMD for their GPUs, what happened to that plan? As they said, it would bring their GPUs to the next level and leave ATi in the dust until ATi would come out with GPUs based on MIMD.[/citation]

now i may be wrong, but isn't that what fermi does? i didnt read the wiki but i skimmed it,[/citation]

No, Fermi is still using SIMD.
 

Marco925

Distinguished
Aug 11, 2008
967
0
18,990
[citation][nom]liveonc[/nom]price/performance? So you can save $100 & wind up paying $100 a month in electricity on that super gaming rig? What will laptop owners say when their laptop on has 30 minutes of battery life even though it uses a 12 Cell battery?[/citation]
Some of us don't pay for electricity :p
 

LORD_ORION

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2007
814
0
18,980
You're all talking about gaming performance. They are talking about parallel performance.

CUDA kills ATI Stream... so it looks like this is what they will focus on heavily.

The 450 may suck at gaming, but it crunches numbers like a GTX275. That is phenomenal.

Though it would be nice if Nvidia increased memory bandwidth while focusing on making the parallel processors better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.