sivaseemakurthi
Distinguished
Time to add 2GB of GDDR for 400$ hike in price and hope the reviewers justify it by calling future proof!
Ah, but that's so much easier than doing research...It appears AMD's GPU sales aren't going any better. They were just able to hide it better because they have non GPU revenue streams, notably console APU's, which "conveniently" got put in the "gaming revenue" category with GPU's for the first time this quarter and were able to mask the huge GPU revenue drop.
AMD was down 35% from last quarter and 41% from their high 2 quarters ago. Meanwhile, Nvidia was down 44% from the previous quarter which was their peak, and 40% down from 2 quarters ago. I wouldn't exactly be laughing at Nvidia while pretending AMD is rolling along unscathed.
Also of note from this chart, AMD's console revenue is almost triple it's dGPU revenue. It sure looks like mining fueled prices shifted gamers towards consoles.
About a year ago, I snagged a Seasonic Prime Titanium PSU, on Newegg, for about 50% off. It seemed like they had overproduced and needed to liquidate some excess inventory.Now if only power supplies would drop in price!
I also have one of these in a system with just an iGPU. It's been flawless and often so quiet I can barely tell the PC is on.I'm still using a 8 year old Seasonic G series.
Now if only power supplies would drop in price!
I'm still using a 8 year old Seasonic G series.
I guess it depends where in the world you are. In the UK, the RRP for a 3060 is £300 ($360), but looking at ASUS UK's shop (MSI & Gigabyte don't have one), they want £420 - £550 ($510 - $665) for them (and most of them are out of stock), but I can get the same cards for £380 to £500 ($460 - $605) from PC hardware shops. It also looks like the stock situation in the UK is noticeably worse than in the US, which probably isn't helping.The biggest discounts are coming from AIB direct sales because they are probably getting "price adjustments" money from Nvidia allowing them to drop prices immediately.
Hahaha. Yep. I don’t feel sorry for them and I never willnNvidia'sGamingMining Revenue Plunges, Jensen Announces Price Cuts
There, I fixed it.
The RTX3050 is as cut-down as it is probably because Nvidia meant to to use GA107 instead of GA106. I'm guessing all GA107s available at the time were reserved by laptop manufacturers so Nvidia had to sacrifice GA106 dies to cram something in the massive gap between the RX6500 and RTX3060.The 3050's graphics chip only has that many more transistors because it's a significantly cut-down 3060 with a third of the chip disabled. They could have probably left a bit more of its cores enabled to allow it to at least match the 2060.
It appears AMD's GPU sales aren't going any better. They were just able to hide it better because they have non GPU revenue streams, notably console APU's, which "conveniently" got put in the "gaming revenue" category with GPU's for the first time this quarter and were able to mask the huge GPU revenue drop.
AMD was down 35% from last quarter and 41% from their high 2 quarters ago. Meanwhile, Nvidia was down 44% from the previous quarter which was their peak, and 40% down from 2 quarters ago. I wouldn't exactly be laughing at Nvidia while pretending AMD is rolling along unscathed.
Also of note from this chart, AMD's console revenue is almost triple it's dGPU revenue. It sure looks like mining fueled prices shifted gamers towards consoles.
Word is that TSMC still can't keep pace with demand. I think the problem of demand slump is mostly limited to a subset of their customers (e.g. GPU makers).The whole semiconductor industry is in trouble here, they over built for the massive spike in demand and now that demand has normalized they are stuck with way too much capacity. Semiconductor prices will drop and their stocks will go down as well.
If TSMC was willing to compromise with Nvidia to re-schedule wafers a few months later but not cancel outright, I'd say this implies TSMC would have only about that many months worth of back-orders left if it let its 5nm customers downgrade their existing minimum commitments as much as they wanted to.Word is that TSMC still can't keep pace with demand. I think the problem of demand slump is mostly limited to a subset of their customers (e.g. GPU makers).
3050 is the Turing generation of the lower end. Whether or not you think they are worthwhile, they added RTX and tensors cores to the 16xx series that adds costs without improving rasterized performance. Transistor count is almost twice as high and it has 33% more memory compared to a 1660 super. The MSRP of $250 was fine at launch, only $20 more than the 1660 Super. However, the lowest priced one on Newegg right now is $325. That is awful, and that's the cheapest one. At this point they should be below $200.