[citation][nom]the_krasno[/nom]Imagine what you could do with this coupled with Google's 1gigabit internet?[/citation]
Download all the internet porn in one hour.
Hmmmm, I'm thinking THG should do a system build with one of these, then give it away.
[citation][nom]otacon72[/nom]"offering read speeds of up to 1.3GB/s, write speeds of up to 1GB/s, and a sustained write speed of up to 550MB/s."Lets see, down payment on a house or 2TB's of Z-Drive R2 SSD's. Tough choice.[/citation]
Thats faster than my sdram transfer speeds according to memtest on my current rig! Oh,,,,a poor boy could wish =)
[citation][nom]shuffman37[/nom]Thats faster than my sdram transfer speeds according to memtest on my current rig! Oh,,,,a poor boy could wish =)[/citation]
Create a software RAM drive and run HD Tune on it to see the real results.
Here are my results: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2802/4433346194_ea936d899b_o.png
Max of: 3029 MB/s
[citation][nom]otacon72[/nom]"offering read speeds of up to 1.3GB/s, write speeds of up to 1GB/s, and a sustained write speed of up to 550MB/s."Lets see, down payment on a house or 2TB's of Z-Drive R2 SSD's. Tough choice.[/citation]
don't be stupid, get the z-drives
[citation][nom]lauxenburg[/nom]WTF 1.3GB/s....someone's gotta get Tom's a Spellcheck cause I think they made a typo.[/citation]
I think 1.3GB/s is right (be it 1.3gb/s will make it only 162MB/s).
There is faster ioDrive Duo already for some time.
If Win7 boots in 10 seconds with an intel X25-G2 (about 280MB/s max).... this sucker at 4 times the performance should boot Windows 7 before you press the Power button!
A PCI-E "drive" is still the fastest possible solution that not even SATA-3.0 can touch.
If the 256GB version is $800~900, it wouldn't be much more expensive than regular SSDs. Give it about another 2-3 years, perhaps such a beast will be around $300.
[quotemsg=9196234,14,118937]Create a software RAM drive and run HD Tune on it to see the real results.
Here are my results: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2802/4433346194_ea936d899b_o.png
Max of: 3029 MB/s [/quotemsg]
I would do that but I'm currently running a stripped down version of Ubuntu. If I write stuff to the virtual disk "shrm" file that saves information in memory I can transfer files around in less than a second that'll fill up my 384mb of sdram 133. (only about 200mb of it is even usable after boot up) As for memtest I'm getting about 540MBps or so of sustained read/write and my L1 cache is about 3GBps on my 1.7ghz Willemette if I remember the results correctly. So I'm pretty sure your actual ram transfer speeds are faster than my L1 caches on my old lovely, bandwidth starved P4. Hopefully I'll have a Phenom ii 965, or a lower end Core i7 in the near future if I can find some steady work or my step dad gets his disability. (17 year old teen in MI, not fun finding work)
[citation][nom]otacon72[/nom]"offering read speeds of up to 1.3GB/s, write speeds of up to 1GB/s, and a sustained write speed of up to 550MB/s."Lets see, down payment on a house or 2TB's of Z-Drive R2 SSD's. Tough choice.[/citation]
Houses are overrated.
The concept is spectacular, but the reviews I've read about the older z-drives were not that impressive. It seems that the internal raid controllers were still not optimized for SSD's(or something like that) resulting in real world performance that was not that much better than a single SSD. If they have corrected this problem, have at least a three year warranty(it's actually four drives so failure rate is probably higher than most SSD's), and have kept the price under a grand then I would buy the 256gb in a heartbeat. Now if I could just get traditional HDD in a PCI-e form-factor to handle storage, imagine how compact your rig could be. Eh, I suppose vibration and cost make this a non-starter, lol.