[citation][nom]ramicio[/nom]When are we going to get 3.5" SSDs?[/citation]
Why would you WANT the same thing in a larger package? it wont make it any faster or any cheaper... and these days most SSD drives come with a free 2.5 to 3.5 bracket adapter to mount in Desktop PC's. If yours didn't, the bracket is a simple piece of metal that costs less then 2 dollars in most cases.
[citation][nom]ramicio[/nom]When are we going to get 3.5" SSDs?[/citation]
you can fit 1TB or more of flash inside of a 2.5" enclosure, so why would you want something bigger? a larger drive just obstructs airflow.
Are these going to be more reliable that OCZ's past offerings?
Don't get me wrong, OCZ offered the best performance/price ratio for people who knew what they were doing, but I would never consider putting an OCZ (or any Sandforce) SSD in a computer I built for friends and family. The PITA of constantly going over to fix it just isn't worth it.
[citation][nom]shqtth[/nom]Kill the 64GB models already.[/citation]
Why? They still serve as an entry point for someone who doesn't have a lot of cash to spend but wants faster OS boot. Till SSD prices go near 0.2-0.3 dollars/GB, the 64GB models make sense.
[citation][nom]anort3[/nom]Why did you keep going back 15 times?? I think 2 failures in a row would have convinced me not to use that drive again.[/citation]
He probably bought all 15 in a single batch.
My main workstation has been running for the past two years with 2 OCZ Vertex 2 Max IOPS. My sister's computer has one too that's almost two years old. No problems so far. I've had a Vertex 3 in my laptop for the last year. None of them have failed on me so far. Maybe I'm just lucky...