Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (
More info?)
Hi!
I think you just opened a pandora's box..........
It depends on about a million and one things!
As others have stipulated, you will lose some quality, lossy compression
scheme (in your case, MPEG-2 DVD) result in output having less details than
the original. How much ? Depends on the settings of your encoder and on
the quality out your source footage.......
Why do commercial DVDs looks better ?
Simple! Mainly because of the source material! Because they are not
shooted using 500$ MiniDV camcorder! (Not even 3000$ ones!) They are film
shooted with 50,000$ dollars equipement with hi-quality lens that cost
sometimes even more! The filming is done with proper lighting, did you ?
Did you shoot handheld or one a tripod ? They are a lot of people figuring
all the proper need for a shoot! After that, come the post-processing,
expert colour correction, and a lot of other thing...........
The outcome is that consumer MiniDV produced DVD cannot be as good as big
buck's Hollywood top house production! You are comparing two different
thing's here!
But if you want to, you can come out with some pretty good quality DVDs from
MiniDV footage if you plan a bit in advance what you shoot, and afterward's
if you want to "post-process" before actually burning the DVD.
They are a lot of tutorial on the web about getting the best out of MiniDV.
Look around............
As for myself, I post process from a "bit" to "very much" depending on the
quality of the source video. They are a lot of things to think about when
"manipulating" video to produce good DVDs. I don't know what your level of
knowledge is, but I very much invite you to search and
experiment............... A LOT !!!
🙂
"Rob " the nut "" <EL-CID@TELUS.NET> wrote in message
news
😱mdqc09ncuk13de8jhu7p99her597c293r@4ax.com...
> Is it possible? I am currently using tmpeg, but I can surely see
> artifacts and loss of quality when going from DV video into Mpeg DVD
> format. Whats the best software etc? How come commercial DVDS looks
> so much better?