Okay Malachias Invictus, I did my part.

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Hi Mal,

okay, I've started posting my spellcasting rules. They are not
complete, but I've covered the basics of the framework tonight. You
promised to comment on them if I posted.

I'll be looking for comments to guide where I need to flesh out more in
my more formal writeup. Also, any suggestions for improvement or
extension (I know I haven't written up everything I've got so far, but
it's getting late...) would be appreciated.

If my sample spell writeups are clear enough examples, if anyone wants
to provide some more spell writeups (with augmentations), that'd be cool
too.


For now, though: *sleep*.


Keith
--
Keith Davies "Trying to sway him from his current kook-
keith.davies@kjdavies.org rant with facts is like trying to create
keith.davies@gmail.com a vacuum in a room by pushing the air
http://www.kjdavies.org/ out with your hands." -- Matt Frisch

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

"Keith Davies" <keith.davies@kjdavies.org> wrote in message
news:slrndfm2ve.634.keith.davies@kjdavies.org...
> Hi Mal,
> okay, I've started posting my spellcasting rules. They are not
> complete, but I've covered the basics of the framework tonight. You
> promised to comment on them if I posted.

I'll take a look when I have a sane moment, too.

-Michael

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Michael Scott Brown wrote:
> "Keith Davies" <keith.davies@kjdavies.org> wrote in message
> news:slrndfm2ve.634.keith.davies@kjdavies.org...
>
>>Hi Mal,
>>okay, I've started posting my spellcasting rules. They are not
>>complete, but I've covered the basics of the framework tonight. You
>>promised to comment on them if I posted.
>
>
> I'll take a look when I have a sane moment, too.
>
> -Michael
>
>

Dude, you'r giving your critics way too many straight lines these days.