One Room Ethernet to WIFI Device. Low Range & Radiation?

[ebayguy2006]

One Room Ethernet to WIFI Device. Low Range & Radiation?

I need a device that can connect to an ethernet cable, and create wireless.
However I don't want anything super powerful. That doesn't push a signal farther than 10-15 ft from device. I after this for lowering radiation in home.

this device is the only thing I can find, but still thinking it may be over kill?

https://www.jrselectrohealth.com/p/jrs-eco-wifi-01a/

 

[James Mason]

So... the radiation thing is crazy BS.

It'd be hard to get a low range wifi network without it being total garbage. There's other ways to hide your network, like just telling to not broadcast an SSID so only if people known the name of the network could they connect to it.

Are you trying to make non-wifi device wireless? like a computer?
Or are you trying to get wireless signal too a device, like a cellphone?

 

[ebayguy2006]

Yes to a cell phone. I have a room mate who wants wireless, yet I dont want it. I had the newest 5g & 4g dual band router, but after turning off wifi and going to cat7 shielded, I actually sleep much better and wake up at least 50% less at night.

the trillion dollar industry doesn't want you to believe in radiation. would you, if you sat head of said companies and upon your piles of gold? several countries outlawing smart meters, wifi in schools, and some even putting electric cables and fibre internet under ground. Countries like Denmark warn everyone of the dangers of wifi and cell phones, equal to what the USA does on cigarettes, they attack it...do we really want to re-live another LEAD era catastrophe if not much much worse? Just because it's not over night illness, soft/slow kills are usually the most dangerous...they sneak up on you.

 

[USAFRet]

One Room Ethernet to WIFI Device. Low Range & Radiation?

I need a device that can connect to an ethernet cable, and create wireless.
However I don't want anything super powerful. That doesn't push a signal farther than 10-15 ft from device. I after this for lowering radiation in home.

this device is the only thing I can find, but still thinking it may be over kill?

https://www.jrselectrohealth.com/p/jrs-eco-wifi-01a/

If this is within 10-15 feet, why not just use a Cat5e cable to the PC.
If this is for a cellphone...that puts out at least the same signal strength, except it is about 0.75" from your actual brain.

 

[ebayguy2006]

I dont understand chicks.. she has a mac book, but uses her phone data, and wants wirless signal for her phone to keep from using phone data....

 

[MWP0004]

Yes to a cell phone. I have a room mate who wants wireless, yet I dont want it. I had the newest 5g & 4g dual band router, but after turning off wifi and going to cat7 shielded, I actually sleep much better and wake up at least 50% less at night.

the trillion dollar industry doesn't want you to believe in radiation. would you, if you sat head of said companies and upon your piles of gold? several countries outlawing smart meters, wifi in schools, and some even putting electric cables and fibre internet under ground. Countries like Denmark warn everyone of the dangers of wifi and cell phones, equal to what the USA does on cigarettes, they attack it...do we really want to re-live another LEAD era catastrophe if not much much worse? Just because it's not over night illness, soft/slow kills are usually the most dangerous...they sneak up on you.

I work in a profession that exposes me to radiation levels many, many times higher than anyone in the general public. I can assure you that the radiation given off from a device like this is negligible (and likely non-existent).

 

[USAFRet]

And a low power WiFi router may be worse.
When the phone sees a crappy signal, it may boost its outgoing signal (which is literally right next to your brain) in an effort to actually connect reliably.

So the effort of "lowering radiation in home" may in fact increase it.

 

[ebayguy2006]

And a low power WiFi router may be worse.
When the phone sees a crappy signal, it may boost its outgoing signal (which is literally right next to your brain) in an effort to actually connect reliably.

So the effort of "lowering radiation in home" may in fact increase it.

Thats true, but thats for cell tower, using phone data. Not for using your home wifi and wifi on cell phone enabled. If wifi on phone is enabled it trumps cell data use.

The link I provided of that wifi device shows the output is low, and when tested with a meter it shows such.

 

[ebayguy2006]

Yes to a cell phone. I have a room mate who wants wireless, yet I dont want it. I had the newest 5g & 4g dual band router, but after turning off wifi and going to cat7 shielded, I actually sleep much better and wake up at least 50% less at night.

the trillion dollar industry doesn't want you to believe in radiation. would you, if you sat head of said companies and upon your piles of gold? several countries outlawing smart meters, wifi in schools, and some even putting electric cables and fibre internet under ground. Countries like Denmark warn everyone of the dangers of wifi and cell phones, equal to what the USA does on cigarettes, they attack it...do we really want to re-live another LEAD era catastrophe if not much much worse? Just because it's not over night illness, soft/slow kills are usually the most dangerous...they sneak up on you.

I work in a profession that exposes me to radiation levels many, many times higher than anyone in the general public. I can assure you that the radiation given off from a device like this is negligible (and likely non-existent).

How many hours a day? years? and your health is good? experts saying for adults, 10-20 years, and dna damage in female eggs wont show till your children have children, and isnt depopulation on of the elites top important agendas?

Rhetorical questions... keep on topic...anyone know of a low range wifi device?

 

[bill001g]

So you can get a AP from say ubiquiti and turn the power down to what ever level you like BUT that only turns the AP down. The phone or other end device will still likely transmit at full power. It also constantly transmits to the cell towers likely at close to full power just so it knows when it gets a call.

I suspect you did not install your cat7 shielded cable properly. Shielded cable must be connected to a isolated building ground. If you do not it actually acts like a antenna and increases the interference rather than decreases it. To properly install this is going to be very expensive to get a electrician to put a new ground into your house.

 

[jsmithepa]

That box at usd$65 is cheap, if u need a WIFI router anyway.

Existing WIFI router may already have a setting to reduce power.

Not gonna get into the other stuff, if placebo makes u feel better, that in itself is also medicine!

 

[Someone Somewhere]

I suggest you look into the placebo effect.

the trillion dollar industry doesn't want you to believe in radiation. would you, if you sat head of said companies and upon your piles of gold? several countries outlawing smart meters, wifi in schools, and some even putting electric cables and fibre internet under ground. Countries like Denmark warn everyone of the dangers of wifi and cell phones,

Do you have a source for this, preferably one that specifically ties it to non-ionising radiation, and not e.g. privacy concerns, cost etc? I can't find anything from a reliable source; I found one source that said Italy had banned them completely and that it was 'censored from the US news media' - and another article from around the same time saying 90%+ of Italian homes had them.

Most of the articles I've read have had ludicrously poor attempts at science in them.

Cellphones deliver the same or higher transmit power in effectively the same band (often 17-1900MHz or 2600MHz, vs WiFi in 2400MHz).

 

[ebayguy2006]

I suggest you look into the placebo effect.

the trillion dollar industry doesn't want you to believe in radiation. would you, if you sat head of said companies and upon your piles of gold? several countries outlawing smart meters, wifi in schools, and some even putting electric cables and fibre internet under ground. Countries like Denmark warn everyone of the dangers of wifi and cell phones,

Do you have a source for this, preferably one that specifically ties it to non-ionising radiation, and not e.g. privacy concerns, cost etc? I can't find anything from a reliable source; I found one source that said Italy had banned them completely and that it was 'censored from the US news media' - and another article from around the same time saying 90%+ of Italian homes had them.

Most of the articles I've read have had ludicrously poor attempts at science in them.

Cellphones deliver the same or higher transmit power in effectively the same band (often 17-1900MHz or 2600MHz, vs WiFi in 2400MHz).

yes non-ionizing radiation. but 2.4ghz is old, its 4ghz and 5ghz bands now. Its the higher frequencies & amount of power behind them that is increasing the harm. Congress has a bill to pass mini cell tower 5G on every 12th electric poll...so your lucky if you dont live within 100-300M of a cell tower, are a chick who nukes herself via smartphones hours a day, 5g wifi's in home and school + neighbors wifi & smart meters, and soon a TON more cell towers. Say good bye to your sperm count and kiss your DNA good bye.


http://www.electricsense.com/198/is-wifi-safe/
Just one of many sites.
https://michiganstopsmartmeters.com/2017/02/08/michigan-2017-smart-meter-bill-in-works/
Many states have been fighting smart meters. There is an engineer vigilantedave who in one of his post, claims to have taken apart some of the smart meters and found highly needed saftey components missing. Ive tied his statements into many of the newer smart devices and 4k tv's. How people are getting radiation burn (sun burn) on skin, eyes, hair after extended uses seeing as you can sit closer to screens now and how tv's and other devices dont have grounded cords anymore. They even go to making claims that the hdmi cords carry the emf/rf ect to your computer or other devices and discharge that way...rofl.
Some good videos on youtube too.
Ive also heard of couples from doctors posting, think on youtube, or cant recall, that they couldnt conceive, and one couple left society, went camping far away from any cities for 30 days, and they conceived no problem, even had sperm count tested upon return and it went from nothing to insane normal levels.

Others are aware of low hormone levels. How men used to be MEN, and now we(and women), are starting to devolve.

Non-ionizing radiation on blood cells, dna, sperm, eggs, children thin skulls, speeding up of wrinkle formation, are all good things to google, and by no means limited to the few ive listed. cant do the work for ya.

if we actually had an FDA or CPA who wasnt influenced and controled by central bankers/corporations, just like the majority of the rest of the world, then ya, all of the studies done by scientist ect would be mainstream. Do you know how much money was lost when they had to recall and remove smart meters across canada plus the cost of the smart meter production?

Radiation sensitivity is like allergies, it can come out of no where. Most can handle any thing until it overloads ones defenses or wears down your body/immune system. You can reverse allergies, dont listing to main stream doctors. NAT specialist, few in each state can assist.

Sorry for grammar and I can provide much more later, but I am time restraint and must run.

 

[ebayguy2006]

So you can get a AP from say ubiquiti and turn the power down to what ever level you like BUT that only turns the AP down. The phone or other end device will still likely transmit at full power. It also constantly transmits to the cell towers likely at close to full power just so it knows when it gets a call.

I suspect you did not install your cat7 shielded cable properly. Shielded cable must be connected to a isolated building ground. If you do not it actually acts like a antenna and increases the interference rather than decreases it. To properly install this is going to be very expensive to get a electrician to put a new ground into your house.

the shielding prevents emf/rf or signals from getting in and out of the cable. grounding it would discharge the radiation in and potentially outside that may possibly be attracted to the shielding metal. But I agree with the rest of what you stated. I cant make or teach her to put her phone into airplane mode when she is web surfing and not in need of cell connection.

 

[USAFRet]

If you truly believe it is this bad, why are you allowing WiFi and cellphones in your house?

 

[bill001g]

So you can get a AP from say ubiquiti and turn the power down to what ever level you like BUT that only turns the AP down. The phone or other end device will still likely transmit at full power. It also constantly transmits to the cell towers likely at close to full power just so it knows when it gets a call.

I suspect you did not install your cat7 shielded cable properly. Shielded cable must be connected to a isolated building ground. If you do not it actually acts like a antenna and increases the interference rather than decreases it. To properly install this is going to be very expensive to get a electrician to put a new ground into your house.

the shielding prevents emf/rf or signals from getting in and out of the cable. grounding it would discharge the radiation in and potentially outside that may possibly be attracted to the shielding metal. But I agree with the rest of what you stated. I cant make or teach her to put her phone into airplane mode when she is web surfing and not in need of cell connection.

That is the purpose of the ground to prevent it from acting as a antenna. You will actually bring more signals into your house from outside and to a point amplify them. They have no place to go but into your equipment or out into the air....which is exactly what you seem so afraid of. When you have a ground they are taken out of the house into the earth. You are best off not even having the shielding if you are not going to install it correctly. The shield will attract far more signal that the almost undetectable signals that might come from a ethernet cable.

You are so worried about things that are not a issue and you try to ignore something that actually is a issue....not that the signals the wire receives will hurt people anyway.

It is crazy to think someone would every put their cell phone in airplane mode. What is someone going to come knock on your door and say I want to call you please turn your phone on.

I hope you do not have a microwave oven either. They leak signals on the same exact frequencies as WiFi routers. Also I hope you use only old lights because the ballasts in florescent lights and led lights put out far more signals than any router does.

So here is the solution. get a tin foil hat....errr fairday cage. Best is copper mesh screen but aluminum windows screen will work if you can not afford copper Line all the walls with it and connect it all together with short copper wires. You then connect this to the electrical ground. This method will guarantee that no signals can get in or out. You can live in this room and your house mate can enjoy their internet and phone

 

[ebayguy2006]

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIAA0S4BH5934&ignorebbr=1&nm_mc=KNC-GoogleMKP-PC&cm_mmc=KNC-GoogleMKP-PC-_-pla-_-Range+Extenders-_-9SIAA0S4BH5934&gclid=Cj0KEQiAw_DEBRChnYiQ_562gsEBEiQA4LcssrorvssI6L7LnCpx-ilOzSmXYTxI94p6VNUlgygC6PgaApbf8P8HAQ

 

[Singer_2]

Youtube

 

[Someone Somewhere]

I suggest you look into the placebo effect.

the trillion dollar industry doesn't want you to believe in radiation. would you, if you sat head of said companies and upon your piles of gold? several countries outlawing smart meters, wifi in schools, and some even putting electric cables and fibre internet under ground. Countries like Denmark warn everyone of the dangers of wifi and cell phones,

Do you have a source for this, preferably one that specifically ties it to non-ionising radiation, and not e.g. privacy concerns, cost etc? I can't find anything from a reliable source; I found one source that said Italy had banned them completely and that it was 'censored from the US news media' - and another article from around the same time saying 90%+ of Italian homes had them.

Most of the articles I've read have had ludicrously poor attempts at science in them.

Cellphones deliver the same or higher transmit power in effectively the same band (often 17-1900MHz or 2600MHz, vs WiFi in 2400MHz).

yes non-ionizing radiation. but 2.4ghz is old, its 4ghz and 5ghz bands now. Its the higher frequencies & amount of power behind them that is increasing the harm. Congress has a bill to pass mini cell tower 5G on every 12th electric poll...so your lucky if you dont live within 100-300M of a cell tower, are a chick who nukes herself via smartphones hours a day, 5g wifi's in home and school + neighbors wifi & smart meters, and soon a TON more cell towers. Say good bye to your sperm count and kiss your DNA good bye.


http://www.electricsense.com/198/is-wifi-safe/
Just one of many sites.
https://michiganstopsmartmeters.com/2017/02/08/michigan-2017-smart-meter-bill-in-works/
Many states have been fighting smart meters. There is an engineer vigilantedave who in one of his post, claims to have taken apart some of the smart meters and found highly needed saftey components missing. Ive tied his statements into many of the newer smart devices and 4k tv's. How people are getting radiation burn (sun burn) on skin, eyes, hair after extended uses seeing as you can sit closer to screens now and how tv's and other devices dont have grounded cords anymore. They even go to making claims that the hdmi cords carry the emf/rf ect to your computer or other devices and discharge that way...rofl.
Some good videos on youtube too.
Ive also heard of couples from doctors posting, think on youtube, or cant recall, that they couldnt conceive, and one couple left society, went camping far away from any cities for 30 days, and they conceived no problem, even had sperm count tested upon return and it went from nothing to insane normal levels.

Others are aware of low hormone levels. How men used to be MEN, and now we(and women), are starting to devolve.

Non-ionizing radiation on blood cells, dna, sperm, eggs, children thin skulls, speeding up of wrinkle formation, are all good things to google, and by no means limited to the few ive listed. cant do the work for ya.

if we actually had an FDA or CPA who wasnt influenced and controled by central bankers/corporations, just like the majority of the rest of the world, then ya, all of the studies done by scientist ect would be mainstream. Do you know how much money was lost when they had to recall and remove smart meters across canada plus the cost of the smart meter production?

Radiation sensitivity is like allergies, it can come out of no where. Most can handle any thing until it overloads ones defenses or wears down your body/immune system. You can reverse allergies, dont listing to main stream doctors. NAT specialist, few in each state can assist.

Sorry for grammar and I can provide much more later, but I am time restraint and must run.

You know how I said reliable source? I can prove the earth is flat too, or that dihydrogen monoxide is a colourless odourless liquid that kills thousands of people per year, and is almost completely unregulated.