Order

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.int-fiction (More info?)

Just to be curious, why did people think this game wasn't so good. I
personally liked the response to create bug.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.int-fiction (More info?)

"Sabel4" <jhsaunders@alltel.net> wrote in message
news:af247ac2.0411171551.40aedc47@posting.google.com...

> Just to be curious, why did people think this game wasn't so good. I
> personally liked the response to create bug.

I liked it well enough. My biggest concern was that a vital piece of solving
a vital puzzle was completely missing from the game. It exists, and you can
refer to it, but it was mentioned not at all in the room...

---- Mike.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.int-fiction (More info?)

Nothing a good post-comp release won't fix.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.int-fiction (More info?)

On 18 Nov 2004 15:21:35 -0800, Sabel4 <jhsaunders@alltel.net> wrote:
> Nothing a good post-comp release won't fix.

Have you seen the author's record on post-comp releases?

--
------------------------
Mark Jeffrey Tilford
tilford@ugcs.caltech.edu

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.int-fiction (More info?)

Sabel4 wrote:
>
> Nothing a good post-comp release won't fix.

We're judging the comp releases, not the post-comp ones.