G
Guest
Guest
Hello friends,
I am looking to purchase a new system for someone, and they do not use any type of 3D applications. They use heavy processor intensive application/internet programming. I'm just wondering what the advantages/disadvantages are, for a person who has those needs, to own one of the types of processors in the title. I've been looking at P4 1.7 systems with 512 RDRAM (though Intel may be leaving RAMBUS behind so I don't really like this option at all), same with the Dual XEON 1.7. I've heard the Dual AMD 1.2 is good, but not good for the types of things the person will be doing (no game playing, either.) I was looking at AMD 1.4, but then on TomsHardware.com, he has benchmarks for "internet content creation" (not sure what that is though, seems they dont either), but intel is beating AMD's chip in that spec, even though it loses in almost every other benchmark. The person purchasing this PC does not mind cost all too much, AMD would need to be about $1300-1500 cheaper for me to convince him otherwise in fact because he doesn't believe in AMD (he hasn't dealt with anything but intel before). It's hard to convince him that I've read and seen AMD chips running faster than intel at a lower clock/price....
Anyways any suggestions on what type of processor would support his needs?
Serious input only - thanks,
ELmO
I am looking to purchase a new system for someone, and they do not use any type of 3D applications. They use heavy processor intensive application/internet programming. I'm just wondering what the advantages/disadvantages are, for a person who has those needs, to own one of the types of processors in the title. I've been looking at P4 1.7 systems with 512 RDRAM (though Intel may be leaving RAMBUS behind so I don't really like this option at all), same with the Dual XEON 1.7. I've heard the Dual AMD 1.2 is good, but not good for the types of things the person will be doing (no game playing, either.) I was looking at AMD 1.4, but then on TomsHardware.com, he has benchmarks for "internet content creation" (not sure what that is though, seems they dont either), but intel is beating AMD's chip in that spec, even though it loses in almost every other benchmark. The person purchasing this PC does not mind cost all too much, AMD would need to be about $1300-1500 cheaper for me to convince him otherwise in fact because he doesn't believe in AMD (he hasn't dealt with anything but intel before). It's hard to convince him that I've read and seen AMD chips running faster than intel at a lower clock/price....
Anyways any suggestions on what type of processor would support his needs?
Serious input only - thanks,
ELmO