G
Guest
Guest
SpecCpu2k results on intel web page (http://www.intel.com/procs/perf/Pentium4/brief/docs/pentium4.pdf) seem to be unbelieveable high. Still I believe they are for real, because Intel just cannot afford posting fabricated SpecCpu benchmark results of P4. If you take time to compare these results with other results in the SpecCpu results database(http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/cpu2000.html), you can get some kind of picture, what P4 really is capable of. Only high-end Alpha processors are able to compete and surpass P4 in both integer and FP performance.
In my opinion SpecCpu is respected and reliable meter of system level real application performance. So, why P4's performance is so good in Spec bench and so bad in 'legacy' benchmarks, which we have seen on every tech web site last days. One big reason is of course the compiler. Spec bench is compiled with P4 optimizing compiler and we can see huge potential performance gain when optimizing is used. So a big question remains, when will we begin to see P4 optimized software in large scale. At easiest, optimizing can be just compiling source code with the new compiler, which should not be too big task to do for new software developers. Also researchers who need great computational power and are developing their own applications and algorithms can readily take advantage of the optimizing compilers making P4 very attractive computational workstation.
P4 has great potential, which waits to be unleashed by software optimizations. For the time being I cannot see any reason why home user should upgrade to P4, mainly because of high price and non-optimized applications. This will change in next two years, and by then also the prices have gone down quite a bit. Some specialised tasks (for example scientific computations) may allready justify the high price of P4 (which is not that high after all if you compare to Alpha/SUN workstations).
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Zam on 11/23/00 08:45 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
In my opinion SpecCpu is respected and reliable meter of system level real application performance. So, why P4's performance is so good in Spec bench and so bad in 'legacy' benchmarks, which we have seen on every tech web site last days. One big reason is of course the compiler. Spec bench is compiled with P4 optimizing compiler and we can see huge potential performance gain when optimizing is used. So a big question remains, when will we begin to see P4 optimized software in large scale. At easiest, optimizing can be just compiling source code with the new compiler, which should not be too big task to do for new software developers. Also researchers who need great computational power and are developing their own applications and algorithms can readily take advantage of the optimizing compilers making P4 very attractive computational workstation.
P4 has great potential, which waits to be unleashed by software optimizations. For the time being I cannot see any reason why home user should upgrade to P4, mainly because of high price and non-optimized applications. This will change in next two years, and by then also the prices have gone down quite a bit. Some specialised tasks (for example scientific computations) may allready justify the high price of P4 (which is not that high after all if you compare to Alpha/SUN workstations).
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Zam on 11/23/00 08:45 AM.</EM></FONT></P>