Archived from groups: rec.games.video.arcade.collecting (
More info?)
I think it was the first game with a named character that was
controlled by the player. Pac-Man was also given some personality
through the little between-level intermissions. In my opinion, that's
why he's considered the first "character" in video games.
Undeniably, Pac-Man (as a character) was quite a phenomenon. Everybody
tried to jump on the character-driven game bandwagon after that--some
successfully (Donkey Kong, Q*Bert), others not so much (Pengo,
Kangaroo, Venture).
You're right, though--the article's author could have been a bit more
precise in his/her wording. Certainly, as you've pointed out, there
were games before Pac-Man where the player wasn't a tank, paddle, or
missile base. I believe Berzerk was also released before Pac-Man, for
instance. I think what the author really meant to say was that the
player's "character" in games like Warrior or Berzerk was really little
more than a missile base or paddle with legs. Actually, the Warrior
guys didn't even have legs!
-Dave Ellis
http://www.davesclassicarcade.com
computerspacefan@hotmail.com wrote:
> "This was the first time a player took on a persona in the game.
> Instead of controlling inanimate objects like tanks, paddles and
> missile bases" Is that true?
> I mean, what about Frogs?
>
http://www.klov.com/game_detail.php?letter=F&game_id=7858 although it
> could be argued you're just playing different frogs, not one specific
> one with a name.
> I guess Snoopy Pong doesn't really count since you're not playing
> Snoopy
http://www.klov.com/game_detail.php?letter=S&game_id=9598
> How about Warrior?
>
http://www.klov.com/game_detail.php?letter=W&game_id=10408
>
> Any of you Pac aficionados care to comment? Was Pacman really the first
> character-driven game?