You mean this better than previous system ?
Amd Athlon 64 3500 AM2
Asus M2N-E 570 ultra
Gigabyte 7300 GT DDR2
Kingston 2*512 DDR2 533
Hard 80GB SATA2 Hitachi
Power 430w Real PFC
?????????
Let me explain in greater detail as some will post useless black and white responses to meet their agenda.
An AMD Athlon64 3500+ is faster when gaming then an Intel Pentium D 805 by quite a large margin. Now, the way you asked the question seems to imply that you'd be looking at upgrading your processor in 7 months time which means around April of 2007. Given that you'd surely want a motherboard able to take on a new processor at that point in time and would surely want a more powerful processor to take advantage of all the new games, applications and of course Graphics Hardware then I simply cannot recommend the AMD Athlon64 3500+.
It's simple, AMD's only move by that point will be a 65nm shrink of their Athlon64. This indicates that performance/clk will remain the same save for a smaller chip. Totally not worth the upgrade and surely grossly underpowered for games such as Alan Wake.
To be quite honest an Intel Pentium D 805 should perform better under Alan Wake and other soon to be released multi-threaded games then an AMD Athon64 3500+ (which may not even be able to run the game at decent settings).
And in 7months time you'll be able to upgrade to a Core 2 Duo, which is the best gaming platform that is available now and the best architecture even 7 months down the road (though we will have Quad Core variants by then).
So honestly, if I were you, I'd wait a bit and huddle up some more cash for a Core 2 Duo E6300. No point in getting an AM2 Athlon64, as potential upgrades for it in 7 months time will leave a sour taste in your mouth.
That was great , thanks a lot my dear ...............
ok so , more patience be able to get better system finally !
but at this point i need new system for gaming ! and i think you suggested intel CPU Dual core is right now for me ! ok ? ? ? ? ?
maybe i able buy better VGA like 7600GS .........thank you
The Intel CPU is best ONLY if you intend on upgrading to a Core 2 Duo in 7 months time. Other then that the AMD system will give you better gaming performance for now then the Intel system you proposed (Pentium D 805).
It's quite complicated as games coming out will perform better on the Pentium D 805 then they would on the Athlon64 3500+ (hell Alan Wake will perform better on a Pentium4 with HT then an Athlon64). But games that are out right now do not benefit greatly for Multiple Cores.
Tough choice really.. on one hand I despise the Netburst CPU's (Pentium D) on the other I find myself having to recommend it due to recent information regarding Alan Wake, Crysis and UT2007. It's a tough call really... and I can't believe I'm recommending it.
Just make sure you upgrade to a Core 2 Duo later on...