My question is this.
I'm buying a new computer, and one the main components will be a NEC 17inch 1760v LCD monitor. This has a claimed response time of 16ms. Various articals argue the truth of this claim saying it lies somewhere closer to 25 ms.
Either way, this allows a maximum screen resolution of 1280 x 1024 and maximum frame rate of 60fps (16ms) and perhaps as bad as 40fps(25ms)
If this is the case, is buying a super nice video card going to be a waste of money if my frame rate can't go higher than 60fps? It appears that the monitor will be a bottleneck in some ways. I new this when I purchased it (never buy an LCD if you're a gamer they say)
I was intending on buying a ATI / Asus 9600 pro or something around that benchmark.
I'd just like to know where to stop spending as far as a video card is concerned.
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Twigg on 12/08/03 01:48 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
I'm buying a new computer, and one the main components will be a NEC 17inch 1760v LCD monitor. This has a claimed response time of 16ms. Various articals argue the truth of this claim saying it lies somewhere closer to 25 ms.
Either way, this allows a maximum screen resolution of 1280 x 1024 and maximum frame rate of 60fps (16ms) and perhaps as bad as 40fps(25ms)
If this is the case, is buying a super nice video card going to be a waste of money if my frame rate can't go higher than 60fps? It appears that the monitor will be a bottleneck in some ways. I new this when I purchased it (never buy an LCD if you're a gamer they say)
I was intending on buying a ATI / Asus 9600 pro or something around that benchmark.
I'd just like to know where to stop spending as far as a video card is concerned.
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Twigg on 12/08/03 01:48 AM.</EM></FONT></P>