caamsa :
I would not say that no one calls him out on it. A lot of people call him out on it. Also I would not say that he lashes out in a childish way anymore than a lot of people do in these forums.
Actually, BM started doing this 2 years ago, and it has never stopped. Can you say the same for the rest of the forum?
I think he truly believes what he posts to be true based upon his over optimistic view of AMD and hatred of
Intel.
If he truly believes what he posts, then he should be able to back it up with solid facts, even its technical data. Yet he presented none. When confronted with solid facts, instead of presenting his own data, he used editorials to prove his points. When he was asked to provide links, he provided a blog. How is that solid evidences? How is that real technical data?
People want to be optimistic about AMD, but not overly-optimistic that its not in touch with reality anymore. Back in the Core 2 days, he claimed C2 will suffer from cache thrashing. It was proven wrong. Then he claimed AM2 would perform on par with Core 2, which was also proven wrong. Then he said 4x4 will be the ultimate enthusiast platform, which turned out, performed lower than lowered clocked Q6700 by a wide margin. Then he claimed K10 will annihilate any Core 2 at 1Ghz; do you think he's right? This is not optimism. This is simply his "opinions", based on his preference for AMD, with no solid facts. Yet he claimed it as if its the truth. To be honest, he's just like the boy who cried wolf. If he's done frequent enough, what do you think his credibility will be?
I don't think he is coming up with these numbers on his own it is stuff that he has probably read and then posting. How would he know benchmarks etc. ..... unless he reads them some where.
Then why does he not present it when asked? We're in a modern world, where information is readily available on the internet.
There was a respectable forum back in the summer, with the name Jack. He also made a lot of claims, but he not only backed them up with actual technical information and data, he also carefully explained them so everyone knows what he's talking about. He gained a lot of respect from us, because he basically shared his knowledge. He once claimed AMD's 65nm is suffering problem, which is evident now. He also claimed Intel's HK/MG to be one of the innovative technologies in the industry, which appears to be true.
On the other hand, BM also made a lot of claims, but almost none of them is backed up with the right technical information, or even links. He would just post something like, "I believe blah blah blah will give blah blah and increase in performance about xx%". When confronted, he basically said, "you guys are all AMD haters". How is "I want you to provide more information in regard to your claim" related to "I am an AMD hater"?
You should go and do some searching in the forms regarding BM and you will find plenty of "people calling him out" as you say.
Then you should know better to think twice before believing his claims.