PK warning: Europe, HC, *K.3

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

As soon as my lvl66 javazon stepped out of town in Act 1 Hell the sorc
followed her and bang! I heard my zon dying and the hostile announcement at
the same time. The sorc came to the screen and the guy advertised a web page
in domaine *.tk. The game was named "Act1 q2-"
That's it. Short and painfull lesson: I learnt not to play in public games
anymore...
--
*dzid_pl (EuSCL)
*dzid_pl_hc (EuHCL)
remove "_spam" from my address
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

"Jaroslaw Banachowicz" <banjar1_spam@lido.net> wrote in message
news:i5i382-1jd2.ln1@airbus.lhsystems.pl...
> As soon as my lvl66 javazon stepped out of town in Act 1 Hell the sorc
> followed her and bang! I heard my zon dying and the hostile announcement
at
> the same time. The sorc came to the screen and the guy advertised a web
page
> in domaine *.tk. The game was named "Act1 q2-"
> That's it. Short and painfull lesson: I learnt not to play in public games
> anymore...
> --
> *dzid_pl (EuSCL)
> *dzid_pl_hc (EuHCL)
> remove "_spam" from my address
>

and you just learned this?

there is a reason why there is only a handfull of public hell games.
only pk's make em. HC

-a|ex
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

127.0.0.1 wrote:
> "Jaroslaw Banachowicz" <banjar1_spam@lido.net> wrote in message
> news:i5i382-1jd2.ln1@airbus.lhsystems.pl...
[...]
> > That's it. Short and painfull lesson: I learnt not to play in
> > public games anymore...
>
> and you just learned this?
>
> there is a reason why there is only a handfull of public hell games.
> only pk's make em. HC

After all he only started playing online recently and not several
years ago like you or me.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

"Gundemarie Scholz" <spamyousilly@inbox.ru> wrote in message
news:31fndbF38r9h5U1@individual.net...
> 127.0.0.1 wrote:
> > "Jaroslaw Banachowicz" <banjar1_spam@lido.net> wrote in message
> > news:i5i382-1jd2.ln1@airbus.lhsystems.pl...
> [...]
> > > That's it. Short and painfull lesson: I learnt not to play in
> > > public games anymore...
> >
> > and you just learned this?
> >
> > there is a reason why there is only a handfull of public hell games.
> > only pk's make em. HC
>
> After all he only started playing online recently and not several
> years ago like you or me.

he's a clvl66 javazon in HC... my highest so far playing legit is clvl53 (3
months and alota dead clvl 40's)
as you remember, i quit playing just before summer and gave away my
accounts. it's nice to return as a newbie. i missed how challenging it was
to play legit. my only concern is, i get hostiled in every public NM game.
looks like i'm gona have to install MH to find the PK in the group.

technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?

kinda sux that my old character names can't be reused when the accounts
expire.

-a|ex
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 17:34:31 GMT, "127.0.0.1" <get.rooted@localhost>
wrote:

>my only concern is, i get hostiled in every public NM game.
>looks like i'm gona have to install MH to find the PK in the group.

I would recommend the Amazon Basin for any HC player who is sick of
the PK-dominated ambience of public HC games.

-- Roy L
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

"127.0.0.1" <get.rooted@localhost> wrote in message
news:HEHsd.6015$Va5.5897@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?

Yes.
D2:LOD EULA Section 3/C/iv, and B-net TOUA Section 4/A/xvii.

Regards-
Mark

Bongo-Fury
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:47:18 GMT, "Mark" <mteNO@earthlinkSPAM.net>
wrote:

>
>"127.0.0.1" <get.rooted@localhost> wrote in message
>news:HEHsd.6015$Va5.5897@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>>
>> technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?
>
>Yes.
>D2:LOD EULA Section 3/C/iv, and B-net TOUA Section 4/A/xvii.
>
>Regards-
>Mark
>
>Bongo-Fury
>

I'm too lazy to lookup the references... certainly this can't apply if
you *OWN* two copies of the game?

....
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

"noneyabusiness" <me@you.com> wrote in message
news:6rc8r05vl9h97g9aoh4jk5r33odputofqv@4ax.com...
> >>
> >> technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?
> >
> >Yes.
> >D2:LOD EULA Section 3/C/iv, and B-net TOUA Section 4/A/xvii.
>
> I'm too lazy to lookup the references... certainly this can't apply if
> you *OWN* two copies of the game?

It certainly does. In the future, I suggest you read and understand
documents before you agree to abide by them.

Regards-
Mark

Bongo-Fury
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

127.0.0.1 wrote:

> there is a reason why there is only a handfull of public hell games.
> only pk's make em. HC

When I played more actively, I frequently created public HC games, but I
never partied with anyone, and just played in unpopular areas (Flayer
Jungle and such). I also always teleported a few screens away from the
waypoint, so that there would be monsters between the waypoint and my
character. :) Never lost a character to a PK, despite playing mostly in
public games. Yeah, I guess I was lucky, but it's also a bit of a matter
of how you play (and where).

M.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:35:49 GMT, "Mark" <mteNO@earthlinkSPAM.net>
wrote:

>
>"noneyabusiness" <me@you.com> wrote in message
>news:6rc8r05vl9h97g9aoh4jk5r33odputofqv@4ax.com...
>> >>
>> >> technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?
>> >
>> >Yes.
>> >D2:LOD EULA Section 3/C/iv, and B-net TOUA Section 4/A/xvii.
>>
>> I'm too lazy to lookup the references... certainly this can't apply if
>> you *OWN* two copies of the game?
>
>It certainly does. In the future, I suggest you read and understand
>documents before you agree to abide by them.
>
>Regards-
>Mark
>
>Bongo-Fury
>
Mark

I see nothing in the D2LOD EULA Section3/C/iv that prohibits me from
running two fully licensed copies of this game on two pcs
concurrently. Perhaps you would take the trouble to explain the legal
terminology which leads you to the conclusion that to so would be in
contravention of the license, as you clearly *appear* to wish to be
seen as knowledgable in these matters.....?

Tim
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:35:49 GMT, "Mark" <mteNO@earthlinkSPAM.net>
wrote:

>
>"noneyabusiness" <me@you.com> wrote in message
>news:6rc8r05vl9h97g9aoh4jk5r33odputofqv@4ax.com...
>> >>
>> >> technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?
>> >
>> >Yes.
>> >D2:LOD EULA Section 3/C/iv, and B-net TOUA Section 4/A/xvii.
>>
>> I'm too lazy to lookup the references... certainly this can't apply if
>> you *OWN* two copies of the game?
>
>It certainly does. In the future, I suggest you read and understand
>documents before you agree to abide by them.
>
>Regards-
>Mark
>
>Bongo-Fury
>

OK, here's the section you referred to:

xvii) create or maintain, under any circumstance, more than one
simultaneous connection to Battle.net. All such connections to
Battle.net, whether created by Blizzard software products or by other
tools and utilities,


(For emphasis)
may only be made through methods and means expressly approved by
Blizzard Entertainment.

Under no circumstances may you connect or create tools that allow you
to connect to Battle.net's private binary interface or interfaces
other than those explicitly provided by Blizzard Entertainment for
public use;
[end quote]

A second copy/cdkey/licence is probably the "explicitly provided
method" but this is not elaborated anywhere in any Blizzard text.

All this probably refers to running the game and a BOT, or any other
program that communicates to the server, on the same machine.

Elsewhere, there is a statement that limits your use of (one copy of)
the game to one specific computer, but nowhere it is stated that only
one copy of the game may be played in one HOUSEHOLD.

Therefore, since each EULA allows a person to play one copy of the
game on one computer, buying two games and running them on two
separate computers is expressly allowed.

Just for the hell of it though, I think I'll send a question to
Blizzard and get the official answer (not that I'm going to hold my
breath waiting for a reply).

And in closing, I suggest you don't play Internet Lawyer 😱

....
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:35:49 GMT, "Mark" <mteNO@earthlinkSPAM.net>
wrote:

>"noneyabusiness" <me@you.com> wrote in message
>news:6rc8r05vl9h97g9aoh4jk5r33odputofqv@4ax.com...
>> >>
>> >> technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?
>> >
>> >Yes.
>> >D2:LOD EULA Section 3/C/iv, and B-net TOUA Section 4/A/xvii.
>>
>> I'm too lazy to lookup the references... certainly this can't apply if
>> you *OWN* two copies of the game?
>
>It certainly does.

Sorry, but I don't see any languqage there that would indicate you
can't play two different legitimate copies of the game on two
different machines at the same time. Could you quote the specific
passages you are referring to?

>In the future, I suggest you read and understand
>documents before you agree to abide by them.

I doubt that more than one D2 user in 1000 has read and _accurately_
understood the EULA and TOUA. I know I haven't.

-- Roy L
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

Mark wrote:


>> >> technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?

>> >Yes.
>> >D2:LOD EULA Section 3/C/iv, and B-net TOUA Section 4/A/xvii.

>> I'm too lazy to lookup the references... certainly this can't apply
>> if
>> you *OWN* two copies of the game?

>It certainly does. In the future, I suggest you read and understand
>documents before you agree to abide by them.

I'm sure that outside US such an EULA would be illegal.
I'm not sure that Blizzard really wants to sue me for using my and my
son's PC simultaneously.

Anyway, my D2 classic rusher is now lvl 70, and I *will* go for an
Enigma and a Hoto by using my son's and my PC simultaneously.

BTW:
I learned that a char which finished Andariel/Hell in D2 classic cannot
enter hell mode in LoD after converting.

Is it really true that Mephisto must be finished before converting?
Anyone tryed to convert a char which finished the council quest but
not Mephisto?

It would be so nice to have Mephistos quest drop in LoD ;-)

Koile
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

"noneyabusiness" <me@you.com> wrote in message
news:m2r8r0t47qh62q29itkl1vqsq2sr2274p4@4ax.com...
> >> >>
> >> >> technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?
> >> >
> >> >Yes.
> >> >D2:LOD EULA Section 3/C/iv, and B-net TOUA Section 4/A/xvii.
> >>
> >> I'm too lazy to lookup the references... certainly this can't apply if
> >> you *OWN* two copies of the game?
> >
> >It certainly does. In the future, I suggest you read and understand
> >documents before you agree to abide by them.
>
> OK, here's the section you referred to:
>
> xvii) create or maintain, under any circumstance, more than one
> simultaneous connection to Battle.net. All such connections to
> Battle.net, whether created by Blizzard software products or by other
> tools and utilities,
>
>
> (For emphasis)
> may only be made through methods and means expressly approved by
> Blizzard Entertainment.
>
> Under no circumstances may you connect or create tools that allow you
> to connect to Battle.net's private binary interface or interfaces
> other than those explicitly provided by Blizzard Entertainment for
> public use;
> [end quote]
>
> A second copy/cdkey/licence is probably the "explicitly provided
> method" but this is not elaborated anywhere in any Blizzard text.

Read the whole thing I cited:
Battle.net Terms of Use Agreement
4. Your Use of Battle.net.
A. You are entitled to use Battle.net for your own personal use, but you
shall not be entitled to

When you create a new account on B-net you must agree to this document. And
it is independent of a CD key. A CD key is not a person, an individual is.
Hence the 'your own personal use' statement.

And 'create or maintain, under any circumstances, more than one simultaneous
connection to B-net.' is pretty ironclad. Under any circumstances doesn't
allow for any wiggle room for those with a second CD key.

> All this probably refers to running the game and a BOT, or any other
> program that communicates to the server, on the same machine.
>
> Elsewhere, there is a statement that limits your use of (one copy of)
> the game to one specific computer, but nowhere it is stated that only
> one copy of the game may be played in one HOUSEHOLD.

No, the part you are referring to prevents you from installing the game on
multiple machines for multiple people to play.

> Therefore, since each EULA allows a person to play one copy of the
> game on one computer, buying two games and running them on two
> separate computers is expressly allowed.

But not by the same individual simultaneously on B-net.

> Just for the hell of it though, I think I'll send a question to
> Blizzard and get the official answer (not that I'm going to hold my
> breath waiting for a reply).

I've asked the question in the past and only gotten an automated response
that didn't answer the question. Let me know if you actually get a real
response.

> And in closing, I suggest you don't play Internet Lawyer 😱

Bite me. The guy asked a question and I answered it. Technically using two
computers at once on B-net is cheating. There are hundreds of more severe
problems with B-net, but technically it is cheating. I'm sorry if you don't
like my analysis, but nothing you have provided has changed my opinion.

Regards-
Mark

Bongo-Fury
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

<royls@telus.net> wrote in message news:41b49d11.610199@news.telus.net...
..
>
> Sorry, but I don't see any languqage there that would indicate you
> can't play two different legitimate copies of the game on two
> different machines at the same time. Could you quote the specific
> passages you are referring to?

Battle.net Terms of Use Agreement
4. Your Use of Battle.net.
A. You are entitled to use Battle.net for your own personal use, but you
shall not be entitled to
(xvii) create or maintain, under any circumstance, more than one
simultaneous connection to Battle.net...

> >In the future, I suggest you read and understand
> >documents before you agree to abide by them.
>
> I doubt that more than one D2 user in 1000 has read and _accurately_
> understood the EULA and TOUA. I know I haven't.

I'd put the odds at 1:1,000,000.

Regards-
Mark

Bongo-Fury
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 23:44:40 GMT, "Mark" <mteNO@earthlinkSPAM.net>
wrote:

>
>"noneyabusiness" <me@you.com> wrote in message
>news:m2r8r0t47qh62q29itkl1vqsq2sr2274p4@4ax.com...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?
>> >> >
>> >> >Yes.
>> >> >D2:LOD EULA Section 3/C/iv, and B-net TOUA Section 4/A/xvii.
>> >>
>> >> I'm too lazy to lookup the references... certainly this can't apply if
>> >> you *OWN* two copies of the game?
>> >
>> >It certainly does. In the future, I suggest you read and understand
>> >documents before you agree to abide by them.
>>
>> OK, here's the section you referred to:
>>
>> xvii) create or maintain, under any circumstance, more than one
>> simultaneous connection to Battle.net. All such connections to
>> Battle.net, whether created by Blizzard software products or by other
>> tools and utilities,
>>
>>

>> (For emphasis)
>> may only be made through methods and means expressly approved by
>> Blizzard Entertainment.
>>

>> Under no circumstances may you connect or create tools that allow you
>> to connect to Battle.net's private binary interface or interfaces
>> other than those explicitly provided by Blizzard Entertainment for
>> public use;
>> [end quote]
>>
>> A second copy/cdkey/licence is probably the "explicitly provided
>> method" but this is not elaborated anywhere in any Blizzard text.
>
>Read the whole thing I cited:
>Battle.net Terms of Use Agreement
>4. Your Use of Battle.net.
>A. You are entitled to use Battle.net for your own personal use, but you
>shall not be entitled to
>
>When you create a new account on B-net you must agree to this document. And
>it is independent of a CD key. A CD key is not a person, an individual is.
>Hence the 'your own personal use' statement.
>
>And 'create or maintain, under any circumstances, more than one simultaneous
>connection to B-net.' is pretty ironclad. Under any circumstances doesn't
>allow for any wiggle room for those with a second CD key.
>

As I emphasized above, they allow for lots of wiggle since they never
elaborate on what the "explicitly approved by Blizzard" methods are.

The "all such connections" statement clearly refers to "multiple
connections", so there must be an approved way of creating
simultaneous connections (which I still maintain refers to coming from
ONE PC).

>> All this probably refers to running the game and a BOT, or any other
>> program that communicates to the server, on the same machine.
>>
>> Elsewhere, there is a statement that limits your use of (one copy of)
>> the game to one specific computer, but nowhere it is stated that only
>> one copy of the game may be played in one HOUSEHOLD.
>
>No, the part you are referring to prevents you from installing the game on
>multiple machines for multiple people to play.
>
>> Therefore, since each EULA allows a person to play one copy of the
>> game on one computer, buying two games and running them on two
>> separate computers is expressly allowed.
>
>But not by the same individual simultaneously on B-net.
>

Wiggle room cited above...
And besides, the whole thing is totally UNenforceable.
They have no way to determine if the second connection is being used
by me or someone else in the house.

>> Just for the hell of it though, I think I'll send a question to
>> Blizzard and get the official answer (not that I'm going to hold my
>> breath waiting for a reply).
>
>I've asked the question in the past and only gotten an automated response
>that didn't answer the question. Let me know if you actually get a real
>response.
>

Will do, But, as you've experienced, I've no expectations of getting a
real reply.

>> And in closing, I suggest you don't play Internet Lawyer 😱
>
>Bite me.

Funny. When I first read your "In the future, I suggest..." I was
going to close with "Bite my shiny metal ass" in response to the
condescending tone I read into it.

>The guy asked a question and I answered it. Technically using two
>computers at once on B-net is cheating.
>There are hundreds of more severe
>problems with B-net, but technically it is cheating. I'm sorry if you don't
>like my analysis, but nothing you have provided has changed my opinion.
>

Until Blizzard clarifies the situation with an explicit "One person
cannot use two (or more!) copies of the game to play two (or more!)
characters on Bnet at the same time" statement, I'm going to disagree.

>Regards-
>Mark
>
>Bongo-Fury
>

....
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

I think it was "Mark" <mteNO@earthlinkSPAM.net> that wrote something
like...

>
><royls@telus.net> wrote in message news:41b49d11.610199@news.telus.net...
>.
>>
>> Sorry, but I don't see any languqage there that would indicate you
>> can't play two different legitimate copies of the game on two
>> different machines at the same time. Could you quote the specific
>> passages you are referring to?
>
>Battle.net Terms of Use Agreement
>4. Your Use of Battle.net.
>A. You are entitled to use Battle.net for your own personal use, but you
>shall not be entitled to
>(xvii) create or maintain, under any circumstance, more than one
>simultaneous connection to Battle.net...

Heheh, I can see a slight problem with this. If you're correct in
your reading of all that stuff and there isn't something in the bits
snipped that allows more than one connection from authorised blizzard
software or something to that effect, then anyone connecting to
battle.net with Diablo2 and playing a realms game is breaking the
Terms of Use as Diablo2 will create and maintain two simultaneous
connections to battle.net. One on port 6112 and one on port 4000.

Guess that makes Blizzard even worse than the person who wrote
maphack. ; )

Ashen Shugar
--
The lions sing and the hills take flight.
The moon by day, and the sun by night.
Blind woman, deaf man, jackdaw fool.
Let the Lord of Chaos rule!
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

"Mark" <mteNO@earthlinkSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:I96td.3091$0r.2058@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "noneyabusiness" <me@you.com> wrote in message
> news:m2r8r0t47qh62q29itkl1vqsq2sr2274p4@4ax.com...
> > >> >>
> > >> >> technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?
> > >> >
> > >> >Yes.
> > >> >D2:LOD EULA Section 3/C/iv, and B-net TOUA Section 4/A/xvii.
> > >>
> > >> I'm too lazy to lookup the references... certainly this can't apply
if
> > >> you *OWN* two copies of the game?
> > >
> > >It certainly does. In the future, I suggest you read and understand
> > >documents before you agree to abide by them.
> >
> > OK, here's the section you referred to:
> >
> > xvii) create or maintain, under any circumstance, more than one
> > simultaneous connection to Battle.net. All such connections to
> > Battle.net, whether created by Blizzard software products or by other
> > tools and utilities,
> >
> >
> > (For emphasis)
> > may only be made through methods and means expressly approved by
> > Blizzard Entertainment.
> >
> > Under no circumstances may you connect or create tools that allow you
> > to connect to Battle.net's private binary interface or interfaces
> > other than those explicitly provided by Blizzard Entertainment for
> > public use;
> > [end quote]
> >
> > A second copy/cdkey/licence is probably the "explicitly provided
> > method" but this is not elaborated anywhere in any Blizzard text.
>
> Read the whole thing I cited:
> Battle.net Terms of Use Agreement
> 4. Your Use of Battle.net.
> A. You are entitled to use Battle.net for your own personal use, but you
> shall not be entitled to
>
> When you create a new account on B-net you must agree to this document.
And
> it is independent of a CD key. A CD key is not a person, an individual is.
> Hence the 'your own personal use' statement.
>
> And 'create or maintain, under any circumstances, more than one
simultaneous
> connection to B-net.' is pretty ironclad. Under any circumstances doesn't
> allow for any wiggle room for those with a second CD key.

iron clad? Come on Mark, you do play internet lawyer way, way too often.
For starters there are a lot of people on this planet for which these
ridiculous "contacts" have no legality.

Secondly, if it's so iron clad, what happens when a legal entity eg a
company makes the purchase - my company does own a copy - hence there is no
"personal use" applicable whatsoever.

geez

>
> > All this probably refers to running the game and a BOT, or any other
> > program that communicates to the server, on the same machine.
> >
> > Elsewhere, there is a statement that limits your use of (one copy of)
> > the game to one specific computer, but nowhere it is stated that only
> > one copy of the game may be played in one HOUSEHOLD.
>
> No, the part you are referring to prevents you from installing the game on
> multiple machines for multiple people to play.
>
> > Therefore, since each EULA allows a person to play one copy of the
> > game on one computer, buying two games and running them on two
> > separate computers is expressly allowed.
>
> But not by the same individual simultaneously on B-net.
>
> > Just for the hell of it though, I think I'll send a question to
> > Blizzard and get the official answer (not that I'm going to hold my
> > breath waiting for a reply).
>
> I've asked the question in the past and only gotten an automated response
> that didn't answer the question. Let me know if you actually get a real
> response.
>
> > And in closing, I suggest you don't play Internet Lawyer 😱
>
> Bite me. The guy asked a question and I answered it. Technically using two
> computers at once on B-net is cheating.

the EULA does not dictate what cheating is or isn't. One is poor'ly written
"law" in some areas, the other a question of morality and ethics.

There are hundreds of more severe
> problems with B-net, but technically it is cheating. I'm sorry if you
don't
> like my analysis, but nothing you have provided has changed my opinion.
>
> Regards-
> Mark
>
> Bongo-Fury
>
>
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

"Mark" <mteNO@earthlinkSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:q_Nsd.2504$yr1.1348@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "127.0.0.1" <get.rooted@localhost> wrote in message
> news:HEHsd.6015$Va5.5897@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> >
> > technically, is using 2 pc's cheating?
>
> Yes.
> D2:LOD EULA Section 3/C/iv, and B-net TOUA Section 4/A/xvii.
>
> Regards-
> Mark
>
> Bongo-Fury

ah, i read that section.
to answer my own question, 2 pc's can be used if the following criteria is
met:
only one licensed copy can make only one simultaneous connection.
therefore, 2 pc's each with their own licensed copy is allowed to share a
connection.

that was a simple read.

reading it the wrong way would ban cybercafe's using NAT for bnet games.

-a|ex
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

On that special day, 127.0.0.1, (get.rooted@localhost) said...

> only one licensed copy can make only one simultaneous connection.
> therefore, 2 pc's each with their own licensed copy is allowed to share a
> connection.
>
> that was a simple read.
>
> reading it the wrong way would ban cybercafe's using NAT for bnet games.

Ah, so I am my own cybercafe. That explains why I am at times sitting
here, sipping Capuccino.

SCNR


Gabriele Neukam

Gabriele.Spamfighter.Neukam@t-online.de


--
Ah, Information. A property, too valuable these days, to give it away,
just so, at no cost.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 23:44:40 GMT, "Mark" <mteNO@earthlinkSPAM.net>
wrote:

[snip]
>
>I've asked the question in the past and only gotten an automated response
>that didn't answer the question. Let me know if you actually get a real
>response.
>

I posted a message with Blizzards reply and was dissapointed that you
didnt reply. Then it dawned on me that you were in AGD and not AGD2!!

So, here it is, Blizzards reply:

If you have two unique copies of Diablo II then you can make a
connection with both copies at the same time, however we only support
one connection. This meaning that if you have problems we cannot help
you. You will need to seek help from the network admin, a technician
or troubleshoot the simultaneous connection yourself.

But you are allowed to make the connection to Battle Net with the two
copies of Diablo.


Regards,
Evan C.
Online Support
Blizzard Entertainment


>> And in closing, I suggest you don't play Internet Lawyer 😱
>
>Bite me. The guy asked a question and I answered it. Technically using two
>computers at once on B-net is cheating. There are hundreds of more severe
>problems with B-net, but technically it is cheating. I'm sorry if you don't
>like my analysis, but nothing you have provided has changed my opinion.
>

This should help ;-)

>Regards-
>Mark
>
>Bongo-Fury
>

....
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.diablo,alt.games.diablo2 (More info?)

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, noneyabusiness <me@you.com> wrote:

>> I posted a message with Blizzards reply and was dissapointed that you
>> didnt reply. Then it dawned on me that you were in AGD and not AGD2!!
>>
>> So, here it is, Blizzards reply:
>>
>> If you have two unique copies of Diablo II then you can make a
>> connection with both copies at the same time, however we only support
>> one connection. This meaning that if you have problems we cannot help
>> you. You will need to seek help from the network admin, a technician
>> or troubleshoot the simultaneous connection yourself.
>>
>> But you are allowed to make the connection to Battle Net with the two
>> copies of Diablo.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Evan C.
>> Online Support
>> Blizzard Entertainment
>>

This is consistent with what I got back from Blizzard *months* ago and
talked about here, extensively (and this is from Blizzard support): If
you have a router so that multiple machines look like 1 IP address to
Battle.Net, you can have up to 4 (not 5, not more than 5) machines
connecting from that router onto a given battle.net realm. This is to
say to have 5 (up to 8) machines on battle.net simultaneously from my
home I'd need (at least) two routers utilizing 1 IP address *each* with
4 machines (max) on each one. In testing, if a 5th machine logs in to
battle.net, the 4th looses it's connection, if it re-joins the last 2 to
join will kick each other off battle.net

What the TOU/EULA prohibit is me installing 1 CD/key set on 6 machines
and playing on 6 realms simultaneously.

Questions?


--

USEast HC Ladder: Rockstomper