Post your super pi score

[Da_Banig]

I got the following scores.... At 1M

P4 560 3.6Ghz = 36sec
Pentium D 3.2Ghz = 41sec
Pentium D Oc'ed @ 4.65Ghz = 44sec (throttling)
Pentium D Oc'ed @ 3.93Ghz = 33sec

Feel free to comment or post your scores

 

[guigz]

P4 2.8c @ 3.5 = 40 sec at 1M

 

[RichPLS]

I have a Opteron 175 overclocked to 2.65GHz and got 32.36 seconds using superpi mod 1.4. BTW, SPi 1.4 is not multi-threaded and only uses one core.
Normaly run this chip at 11x235.8 = 2594MHz and under load tops out at 39C

 

[RichPLS]

$hit Happen$

 

[Levium]

AMD 2.0 ghz 3800+X2 No Overclock 44 sec.

 

[WINDSHEAR]

if you slapped some better cooling on that thing you might be able to make a stable 4.6Ghz overclock

 

[Da_Banig]

Ya, currently using Scythe Ninja... not too bad...

Currently OC'ed at 3.93Ghz and still maintain voltage of 1.28-1.32v

 

[SidVicious]

'rig as in sig, mod1.5 XS : 30.547s

 

[YO_KID37]

I got about 01m 10. 969s On the Overclocked rig i got below. Lols pretty Impressive speeds eh. and they're only running on everything that's been listed below. Had to jump the PCI latency up to 35 just to get the graphic card to work correctly.

 

[Bungsta]

I got 37s on my Athlon 64 3500 @ 2.3ghz.

39s on my P4 prescott oced to 3.41ghz.

 

[YO_KID37]

Lols, Did you ever realise that 3500+ is almost 3 generations beyond what i'm showing my clocks at. Lolls don't even let me tell you how ur 2 processers are supperior to mine. But in the end you have to realise that the AMD Athlon XP 1700+ "Throughbred A" at 1.8Ghz gives you pretty impressive scores. Considering that the 1500+ to 2200+ were only suppoed to be out to be in direct competition of the first ever Pentium 4s lols, in which most pentium 3 1.4Ghz coulda easly trump

 

[1Tanker]

35 sec. with setup in sig.

33 sec when i had it @3960

Not bad for a CPU that cost me $158(Canadian) a year ago. :lol:

 

[davidflet9]

p4 prescott: 42.515

 

[ara]

37 sec when i had it at 3.4 (can't be bothered to update sig cos it started getting unstable (it was stable before...))

Ara

 

[Bungsta]

Lols, Did you ever realise that 3500+ is almost 3 generations beyond what i'm showing my clocks at. Lolls don't even let me tell you how ur 2 processers are supperior to mine. But in the end you have to realise that the AMD Athlon XP 1700+ "Throughbred A" at 1.8Ghz gives you pretty impressive scores. Considering that the 1500+ to 2200+ were only suppoed to be out to be in direct competition of the first ever Pentium 4s lols, in which most pentium 3 1.4Ghz coulda easly trump

Sorry if you thought I was replying directly to your score to belittle you? I just wanted to add my scores and hit the nearest reply button which happened to be by your name. You could have bought a socket A 2700+ for like 50 bucks about 6 months or so ago, probably would have been a worthwhile venture.

 

[iterations]

First ever sub 15 second SuperPi_1M has just been posted!

3.3GHz Core 2 Duo (MEROM): 14.984 seconds

http://222.151.144.54/c-board/file/14.984s_T7400ES_3376.4.png

 

[SidVicious]

Obviously not your score, read the thread title next time.

 

[ak47is1337]

29s rig in sig

 

[iterations]

Obviously not your score, read the thread title next time.

Obviously no need to be a jerk about it.

I read the title and then the rest of the thread where it had already diverged off topic. Plus it is very interesting info and relatively on topic so I figured what the hell.

Of all the crap posted on this forum, you picked that post to complain about? hehe.

Back on Topic, two of my rigs:

A64 3200+ @ 2.93GHz, Mushkin PC3500: 32.014 seconds

P4 3.4E @ 3.8GHz, Micron PC3200: 34 seconds

 

[MU_Engineer]

AMD Athlon X2 4200+ @ stock

NOTE: I am using the Linux version, so my times might be a little different than yours.

MU_Engineer@manchester:~/Programs$ ./super_pi 20
Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
compilation.
------ Started super_pi run : Thu May 11 14:27:41 CDT 2006
Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
End of initialization. Time= 0.450 Sec.
I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.401 Sec.
I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.610 Sec.
I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.606 Sec.
I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.577 Sec.
I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.622 Sec.
I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.612 Sec.
I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.580 Sec.
I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.610 Sec.
I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.592 Sec.
I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.591 Sec.
I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.603 Sec.
I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.595 Sec.
I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.579 Sec.
I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.587 Sec.
I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.591 Sec.
I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.587 Sec.
I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.566 Sec.
I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.511 Sec.
I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.417 Sec.
End of main loop
End of calculation. Time= 31.546 Sec.
End of data output. Time= 0.164 Sec.
Total calculation(I/O) time= 31.710( 0.817) Sec.
------ Ended super_pi run : Thu May 11 14:28:14 CDT 2006

 

[ak47is1337]

Obviously not your score, read the thread title next time.

Obviously no need to be a jerk about it.

I read the title and then the rest of the thread where it had already diverged off topic. Plus it is very interesting info and relatively on topic so I figured what the hell.

Of all the crap posted on this forum, you picked that post to complain about? hehe.

Back on Topic, two of my rigs:

A64 3200+ @ 2.93GHz, Mushkin PC3500: 32.014 seconds

P4 3.4E @ 3.8GHz, Micron PC3200: 34 seconds
a64 at 2.93 and only 32 ? dude, what memory timings ?

 

[m0rTu]

mine got 32 sec...2.6GHz @ 4000+

 

[mrquin27]

40 seconds

AMD 3500+ 2.36ghz

 

[iterations]

a64 at 2.93 and only 32 ? dude, what memory timings ?

267MHz
2-3-2-5

Maybe I was running firefox at the same time, I heard that raises times. I dunno, but that is what I got. I'll run it again when I get home from work.

 

[ak47is1337]

a64 at 2.93 and only 32 ? dude, what memory timings ?

267MHz
2-3-2-5

Maybe I was running firefox at the same time, I heard that raises times. I dunno, but that is what I got. I'll run it again when I get home from work.
Dude, that's way faster than what I was running. You sure you weren't throttling? something might have been holding you back.