I agree for the most part, but price drives adoption and it has always been the main factor with looking at components. Price/Performance.
Typically you gain price/performance as you go down the performance tiers, this is one of the few times where the opposite trend is taking shape.
All the reviews cover performance, but also in relation to previous generation products.
3060Ti to 4060Ti comparison is pretty brutal.
Though you are not wrong that for the last decade we have been in a golden age of price parity with increasing performance, for the most part. Beginning with the 20 series it has been going to the other way. Performance parity and price increases in some cases.
Even if you compare prices from yesteryear to now it doesn't quite work. With inflation a flagship GPU should be around $800, maybe $900 now, not $1500. Now I will say you get a lot more with today's flagships, but still it has gotten way out of hand.
8800GT $250 (on the high side)
GTX280 $650 / $430 after poor sales -perfect example of market correction
GTX480/580/
GTX680 $500 - several years of performance increase, no cost increase. Big silicon removed from the 80 Tier
GTX770 $400 last time the previous gen became the new one tier down model.
GTX780 $650 Big silicon back in the 80 tier
GTX980 $550 Big silicon removed from the 80 Tier
GTX980Ti $650
GTX1080 $600 / $500 price dropped to $500 with the launch of the 1080Ti
GTX1080Ti $700
RTX 2080 $800
RTX 2080Ti $1200 -Market failed to speak, they just bought it in droves
RTX 3080 - MSRP $700 - street price, insane (Still a cut down GPU rather than flagship)
RTX 4080 $1200 (A complete tier shift down) 4080 logically should be priced as a 3080 equivalent, but it moved up in price to the Ti/90 tier
RTX4090 $1600
When you look at the 3060 vs the 4060 it is a huge shift down in capability and very expensive, so people are right to complain.