Premium RAM (eg XMS2) v Value RAM (eg Value Select)

Jagdpanther

Distinguished
Mar 15, 2006
28
0
18,530
Hi I was just wondering is Premium RAM worth the extra costs involved? What are the performance benefits.

I am currently planning to upgrade around Mid-year. I am waiting to see how the AM2 socket processors turn out.

I will also upgrade to DDR2 and shift from AGP to PCI-e. I am not a performance at all costs type person nor do I have huge sums of money avaliable. I will most likely overclock in the long term to hold off future upgrades.

So is it worth my while to expend the extra cash on Premium RAM rather thn the budget versions?

I am aiming to get a Dual-Core Processor with something in the GeForce 7 series & 2 Gigs of RAM.

Thanks
 

htoon

Distinguished
Mar 22, 2006
33
0
18,530
if you have a plan to overclock your system, you should go with premium ram. i have corsair value ram. i can not overclock much. if it goes over 680mhz , it becomes unstable.

When you overclock, components like cpu and memory runs faster than their ideal speed. Since cpu and memory work hand in hand, you will never get effective overclocking result if your memory is not running fast enough.

In short, you should go with premium ram. If you do so, please consider muskin or super talent. These memories are expensive but they are way faster than corsair. They have lower latency than corsair.
 

WINDSHEAR

Distinguished
Jan 25, 2006
626
0
18,980
if you have a plan to overclock your system, you should go with premium ram. i have corsair value ram. i can not overclock much. if it goes over 680mhz , it becomes unstable.

When you overclock, components like cpu and memory runs faster than their ideal speed. Since cpu and memory work hand in hand, you will never get effective overclocking result if your memory is not running fast enough.

In short, you should go with premium ram. If you do so, please consider muskin or super talent. These memories are expensive but they are way faster than corsair. They have lower latency than corsair.

I'm using Mushkin Enhanced right now. Running a (512MB) PC3500 DDR434 stick at DDR444 at 2-3-3-8 8)

Low latency is the way to go! :)
 

7H4_D00D3

Distinguished
Dec 30, 2005
449
0
18,780
giving them 50MHZ+ is WAY better than reducing latencies

I own a couple of corsair's valueram 512Mb stix (2.5-3-3-8 )
I ran them 2.5-3-3-8@2T Vs 2--3-3-6@1T.......no big deal only a crappy 5% improvement

Then I ran them 2.5-3-3-8@2T @430Mhz and got 7% improvement. If that behaviour is assumed as linnear, @ 450Mhz you'd get an 11.666666666666666666666666666666666666666666(and so on)% improvement

My highest score on superpi( 1 Mdecimals:45 sec)&sciencemark(867) was with 220*9(cpu----obviously), DDR360 2-2-2-5@1T

I had a very well documented archive of my OC testing....but it got poofed when the system went insane @ 225...