Pro Says No

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

I visited with a professional photography who does fantastic work.;
simply beautiful. She told me that she has seen results fade with both
dye based and pigmented based inkjet printers.

She recommends a wide format dye sublimation printer claiming that
fading would not be a problem.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

show pro:

http://www.wilhelm-research.com/4x6/WIR_4x6_Prints_2004_12_07.pdf

 

[frank]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

missingdata wrote:
> show pro:
>
> http://www.wilhelm-research.com/4x6/WIR_4x6_Prints_2004_12_07.pdf
>
Thanks...that's a keeper.
Frank

 

[frank]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

missingdata wrote:
> show pro:
>
> http://www.wilhelm-research.com/4x6/WIR_4x6_Prints_2004_12_07.pdf
>
Thanks...that's a keeper.
Frank

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Actually, that very much depends. Until recently dye-sub printers had
some of the most fugitive "inks" in them. The dyes, by their very
nature, change state from solid to gaseous, that's how they work.

Many were only CMY, today they are CMYK-UV, on some that adds a black
channel and a over-surface that has UV inhibitors in it. ALso, the dye
sub paper is unique and as such I don't know what testing has been
accomplished on it.

Lastly, although it is true both dye and pigment colorant inks can fade,
most pigment inks are much more stable than dye, and certainly more
stable than most dye sub images.

Art


measekite wrote:

> I visited with a professional photography who does fantastic work.;
> simply beautiful. She told me that she has seen results fade with both
> dye based and pigmented based inkjet printers.
>
> She recommends a wide format dye sublimation printer claiming that
> fading would not be a problem.

 

[birdman]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

Facts should never get in the way of a good opion.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

"birdman" <apquilts@pacbell.net> wrote in news:hs6fe.9777$5o2.4972
@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com:

> Facts should never get in the way of a good opion.
>


"opion?"

Just straightening out the facts ... should that be "opium" or "opinion"?

AA

 

[Rob]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

missingdata wrote:

> show pro:
>
> http://www.wilhelm-research.com/4x6/WIR_4x6_Prints_2004_12_07.pdf
>

Thats interesting as I ( would have) though the Dye sub printers had a
better archival properties.

r

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

AA Battery wrote:

>"birdman" <apquilts@pacbell.net> wrote in news:hs6fe.9777$5o2.4972
>@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com:
>
>
>
>>Facts should never get in the way of a good opion.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>"opion?"
>
>Just straightening out the facts ... should that be "opium" or "opinion"?
>
>AAHole
>
>
>
>

 

[David]

Archived from groups: comp.periphs.printers (More info?)

"AA Battery" <OneVolt@keeps_On_Ticking.net> wrote in message
news:1115485289.85b16fbc9756c9299a709f33f8e9bc19@bubbanews...
> "birdman" <apquilts@pacbell.net> wrote in news:hs6fe.9777$5o2.4972
> @newssvr13.news.prodigy.com:
>
>> Facts should never get in the way of a good opion.
> "opion?"
> Just straightening out the facts ... should that be "opium" or "opinion"?
> AA

"Onion" perhaps?

David