Info (Probably) a great bang for buck deal - RX 5600 non-XT (OEM) Phantom Gaming, $109.99

Status
Not open for further replies.

King_V

Illustrious
Ambassador
So, I was poking around at some low-end cards, and considered an RX 5500 XT 8GB I saw for $139 on Amazon, but the distorted image, and possibly questionable seller, made me think maybe something sketchy was going on.

But, and, apparently they're still in stock, I came across this, and bought it.
ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 5600 6GB GDDR6 PCI Express 4.0 Video Card RX5600 PHANTOM GAMING D3 6G OC - for $109.99 at Newegg. It's a 3-fan unit.

There was also a 2-fan Phantom Gaming variant as well, for $99.99, but that went out of stock quickly.

It is NOT a 5600 XT, and it does NOT have 2304 Stream Processors, despite what the Newegg product page says, but 2048 instead. Aside from that, the page always says 5600 rather than 5600 XT.
It does have the 14Gbps memory (336GB/s bandwidth), though, which I found a little surprising. Further, GPU-Z identifies it as an "RX 5600 OEM"

It came in a rather sturdy, if plain brown, box, fitted for the foam cushioning and to hold the card appropriately, etc. Almost like a retail box, really, except lacking any colors or graphics.

I haven't done anything with it except to run FurMark at the 1080p preset, where it came up with a score of 6442/107 fps, if that really means anything, and topped out at 125-126W of power draw, which I guess is about what the RX 5500 does. Fan curve is too abrupt and too aggressive I think. I'll have to work on that.

And it's got the overkill even for the 5600 XT, nevermind the non-XT, Phantom Gaming cooler. Almost the entirety of the 3rd fan, and the heatsink fins beneath it, are completely off the PCB.

It definitely would be amazing bang for the buck were it an XT, of course, especially considering what the RX 5500, RX 6400/6500, GTX 1650, GTX 1660/Ti/Super etc go for new, even today, but even in this slightly gimped form, I get the impression that it's still great bang for the buck, and might possibly be better in terms of fps/watt than the XT version.

It's a bit weird, but I think I kind of like it. Sort of the big brother to the RX 5300 OEM I picked up a little while back.

@JarredWaltonGPU - have you by any chance run into these or gotten to play around with one?


EDIT: fixed link
 
Last edited:
Followed up a bit with a little bit of testing. Uh, very little bit.

Borderlands 3: 1080p
  • Peak power draw: 106W
  • Peak temperature: 58°C
  • Badass settings, DX12
    • First run: 61.6 fps
    • Second run: 63.4 fps
    • Third run: 66.7 fps
    • Fourth run: 66.5 fps
GPU pegged at 99% utilization almost the entire way through.

Medium preset testing was a bit over 100fps, but doesn't really mean much because at that point, I was pegging the CPU at or near 100% at various places in the benchmark. My test-bed system is only running a 1600AF, with 2x8GB RAM at 3200MHz, with timings of 16-20-20-40.

Plan to play around a bit more, and will get more details. Well, uh, whichever details that I remember to whilst in the midst of testing.

EDIT: formatting
 
Last edited:
hello sir i also purchased this graphics card on black friday <3 :3

i currently have it paired with a b660 mobo 16gigs of ddr4 3200mhz and i am getting amazing FPS in 1080p gaming

but i have a problem i cannot watch apple tv on my computer with this graphic card.

my old card was a intel arc card and with that card i had no problems with apple tv

but with the rx 5600 oem when i try watching anything in apple tv my entire screens turns off and than back on and the apple tv show crashes....

besides this one problem i love this card!

so far i have played gta v, wow dragonflight, far cry 6 and all these games i played them on ultra graphic settings with no lag at all ;d

i cant believe this only cost me 109.99 i was about to purchase a 51risc rx 5600 xt for 159.99 on amazon........

thank you newegg for saving my rear 😀
 
@davidlopez91 , this thread was posted nearly a month ago. You will likely get better help with your issue starting your own thread.
thank you for your response honestly i am not looking for help with apple tv sorry if i spammed his post. i was just excited because i saw that he also purchased the same graphic card i did 😀.
Followed up a bit with a little bit of testing. Uh, very little bit.

Borderlands 3: 1080p
  • Peak power draw: 106W
  • Peak temperature: 58°C
  • Badass settings, DX12
    • First run: 61.6 fps
    • Second run: 63.4 fps
    • Third run: 66.7 fps
    • Fourth run: 66.5 fps
GPU pegged at 99% utilization almost the entire way through.

Medium preset testing was a bit over 100fps, but doesn't really mean much because at that point, I was pegging the CPU at or near 100% at various places in the benchmark. My test-bed system is only running a 1600AF, with 2x8GB RAM at 3200MHz, with timings of 16-20-20-40.

Plan to play around a bit more, and will get more details. Well, uh, whichever details that I remember to whilst in the midst of testing.

EDIT: formatting
also i saw your running a 1600AF thats a 6core 12 thread cpu that uses like 65watts right? with that am4 cpu arent u using pcie 3.0? do you think that would affect the performance of the card? my system uses pcie 4.0 x16 and dude this card performs like my old gtx 1660 or my brothers rtx 3050 no lie i get around the same performance 😀
 
  • Like
Reactions: Order 66
thank you for your response honestly i am not looking for help with apple tv sorry if i spammed his post. i was just excited because i saw that he also purchased the same graphic card i did 😀.

also i saw your running a 1600AF thats a 6core 12 thread cpu that uses like 65watts right? with that am4 cpu arent u using pcie 3.0? do you think that would affect the performance of the card? my system uses pcie 4.0 x16 and dude this card performs like my old gtx 1660 or my brothers rtx 3050 no lie i get around the same performance 😀
In overall benchmarking, the RTX 3050 is about the performance of the GTX 1080 at 1080p.

Judging by the performance clocked in the below performance graph from the RTX 3050 review, it looks like, at least in BL3 at Badass setting (the only game and setting I tried), the 5600 OEM is about 20% ahead.

UC5YtbnjvUuPB3G9FasNmA-1200-80.png.webp

And, the 1660 Super falls short of that. The regular 1660 would be a touch lower still.

I know the normal RX 5600 XT is PCIe x16, so PCIe 3.0 wouldn't hurt it. I'm not sure if the RX 5600 OEM cuts that down to x8 or not, though I would assume not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Order 66
Status
Not open for further replies.