I want to replace my HP Pavilion dv6 laptop (purchased in 2010) with a more current and powerful desktop. I prefer to buy, but willing to try and build my own computer if you think that would be a better route.
Approximate Purchase Date: asap
Budget Range: $1000-2000
System Usage from Most to Least Important:
1. Everyday use (Streaming video/music, Microsoft Office, casual online gaming, etc.)
2. Running a large number of simulations (i.e. running 1 billion rounds of poker) in a timely manner
3. General Programming (Creating mobile apps)
4. Unity Game Engine
5. Playing AAA games (This is not really a necessity, but since I want to run Unity Game Engine, I assume the needs for running AAA games will mostly be met already. Not looking for ultra high graphics, but an enjoyable playing experience with smooth framerate. Want to play Starcraft, Crusader Kings 2, Battlefield, etc.).
Parts Not Required: I have speakers
Country: USA
Parts Preferences: none
Overclocking: Maybe
SLI or Crossfire: I don't know what this means
Monitor Resolution: Not sure
Additional Comments:
It seems like the more research I do, the more confused I get. I still do not know whether I need a gaming pc, workstation, business pc, etc. I do not understand whether I should get a i7 or i5 or even a Xeon processor. And I really have the faintest idea of whether I need SSD, water cooling, etc etc. I mean it all sounds nice, but I really don't know what I need.
Based on reading some articles in PCMag, I narrowed it down to Asus M70AD-US003S (~$1200) and Velocity Micro Edge Z55 (~$2000). And I am also seeing Lenovo ThinkStation P300 SFF which is a workstation. I never even realized a workstation was its own category. It seems impressive with its high PCMark 8 score, but why is the price so low? I hardly even know what that score means other than the brief reading I did on the PCMark website. There must be something more to determining the quality of a computer than reading the performance sections of the PCMag reviews.
Any advice on what I should do is greatly appreciated. Should I go with a computer I listed above or try and build my own? What I don't really get, is how a guy like me with limited hardware experience learned from college is supposed to put together a mid-range desktop that performs well. Shouldn't I be leaving this to someone more experienced?
Approximate Purchase Date: asap
Budget Range: $1000-2000
System Usage from Most to Least Important:
1. Everyday use (Streaming video/music, Microsoft Office, casual online gaming, etc.)
2. Running a large number of simulations (i.e. running 1 billion rounds of poker) in a timely manner
3. General Programming (Creating mobile apps)
4. Unity Game Engine
5. Playing AAA games (This is not really a necessity, but since I want to run Unity Game Engine, I assume the needs for running AAA games will mostly be met already. Not looking for ultra high graphics, but an enjoyable playing experience with smooth framerate. Want to play Starcraft, Crusader Kings 2, Battlefield, etc.).
Parts Not Required: I have speakers
Country: USA
Parts Preferences: none
Overclocking: Maybe
SLI or Crossfire: I don't know what this means
Monitor Resolution: Not sure
Additional Comments:
It seems like the more research I do, the more confused I get. I still do not know whether I need a gaming pc, workstation, business pc, etc. I do not understand whether I should get a i7 or i5 or even a Xeon processor. And I really have the faintest idea of whether I need SSD, water cooling, etc etc. I mean it all sounds nice, but I really don't know what I need.
Based on reading some articles in PCMag, I narrowed it down to Asus M70AD-US003S (~$1200) and Velocity Micro Edge Z55 (~$2000). And I am also seeing Lenovo ThinkStation P300 SFF which is a workstation. I never even realized a workstation was its own category. It seems impressive with its high PCMark 8 score, but why is the price so low? I hardly even know what that score means other than the brief reading I did on the PCMark website. There must be something more to determining the quality of a computer than reading the performance sections of the PCMag reviews.
Any advice on what I should do is greatly appreciated. Should I go with a computer I listed above or try and build my own? What I don't really get, is how a guy like me with limited hardware experience learned from college is supposed to put together a mid-range desktop that performs well. Shouldn't I be leaving this to someone more experienced?