4745454b :
Gold and higher units are a different breed. In order to hit 88%+ efficiency at 20%+ they tend to be efficient no matter where they are. I haven't checked, but look at an 80Bronze 1kW unit. Check out there 10% load if you can even find that data. 88%? Probably more like 75%
I'm about to dump my current PSU. I bought it when I hadn't nailed down what GPU(s) I'd be using. I bought an Antec 750Green. I wanted a decent PSU that could handle any two GPUs I threw at it. Problem is I settled on a single 7950. Now I get to dump my current PSU and get something more suited to what I need. And seeing as I have the money, I'm looking at a good 450-500W gold/platinum unit. As stated above, this should be way efficient no matter what I'm doing. Unlike my current 750W.
I could be wrong but your GPU is always working a fair amount depending on your resolution and screen size
If you are just sitting on the desktop or watching youtube, its very low. 2D clocks and built in functions to the GPU die are great for lowering power usage.
While that 52W is for the card only, your CPU shouldn't be running very hard at all. Assuming a 77W Intel quad, I'd bet it would be at half if not lower. Even if I'm wrong, 52+ 40 + 40 for rest of system is ~130W. Trust me, running a modern system while just surfing or watching a movie doesn't use a lot of power. And I don't know about you, but most of what I do is surf or watch. I game a bit on my weekends so I need a PSU good/large enough to handle that. But not at the expense of what I do 80%+ of the time.
Edit: Link to graph.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7950/25.html
Another way to look at it is to add the ~40W needed to go from idle to Blu ray to another site that lists the system idle. This 40W should be the increase in the card. Toms had their 7950 system idling around 103W, so 143W wouldn't be out of line. Sounds high to me but it is what it is.
Great post, you took the time to look up the actual figures. Going by those figures the PC would probably be in the 200W-250W range.
I have an inherrant distrust of the 450W -550W PSUs because so many builders like Dell use them and they are mass produced very cheaply . This causes a lot of quality control issues.
For example, Corsair's CX600 is an excellent buy bronze rated PSU but if you check the Newegg reviews a LOT of units arrive DOA and Corsair is one of the best out there.
If you are talking about going to a gold or platinum 450W - 550W PSU, then yes you probably avoid the QC problems of the bronze units but again you leave no room for any real changes in your computer. Even more importantly, these units cost just about as much as a gold 650W unit or even my HX 850 if you catch a sale. So I don't see the value of a gold rated 450W unit and there aren't many of them to choose from.
I agree with you and I appreciate your taking the time to look up actual power draws. In the reviews that I have read the 650W PSUs have a much better quality control level and that is why I think they are the best choice. They often don't cost a whole lot more and overall their quality is superior (in professional reviews). For 450-600W PSUs it is sometimes hard to find a single professional review - try finding one for the Corsair CX 600, I couldn't find a single review with a Google search.
I try to read every PSU professional review that comes out as this subject interests me. I particularly like Johnny Guru's reviews (they are funny).
You are absolutely correct and I have said that from the beginning, a 500W PSU will run a single GPU build, no doubt. My choice of the 650W as a base unit is based on a big-picture review of quality vs cost vs efficiency. There is a LOT of room for reasonable people to disagree.
Also while I agree with the numbers you list for draw on the PSU, I am not sure that even those professional review numbers are always accurate. For example, I had a Corsair HX 750 with an I-7 920 single GPU build and incredibly, the HX 750 would ramp up to high fan all the time. Part of it was caused by the case not cooling well but part of it was actual power draw because this would happen when I had a lot of applications open. Professional reviews said that this PSU would put out 900W and remain stable and so I was profoundly disappointed.
I distrust power draw numbers that we see in reviews because they are usually taken during ideal situations and they don't take into account inefficiencies, heat and other factors. This is one of the main reasons I like a lot of headroom on my PSUs.
So the quality control of bronze 450-550W PSUs and my distrust of review numbers and the lack of reviews of lower wattage PSUs all provide a profound distrust in me of them and I am loathe to recommend them. Yes a lot of people (even Dell) use them and don't have problems but I don't like the risk factor.
I know that my system which draws between 300W - 400W runs exceptional well with the HX 850 and it was actually CHEAPER than the HX 750 or many 650W PSUs at the time I purchased it ($144 after rebate). I have never even heard the PSU fan turn on (I'm sure it must go to low fan some time) - the PSU runs completely silent and cool. This tells me it is in its max efficiency range. The HX 850 is a gold rated PSU.
For builders who can afford it, I would recommend the AX 1200i in a heartbeat and I would buy it myself if I needed a PSU. You simply would have a PSU that would last a lifetime (7-year warranty) that is over 90% efficient all of the time on any build you could dream of. But yes it is huge overkill I ABSOLUTELY agree with you.
For people with a reasonable budget, a quality 650W PSU up to my HX 850 depending on what is on sale are all good choices that give me peace of mind. The 450W - 550W PSUs don't give me peace of mind and that is why I don't recommend them. I don't recommend what I personally would not use and don't trust.
You make a very good argument for the low wattage PSUs but I simply don't trust them. Thanks again for your high quality posts.