This is my first overclock, and here's where I'm at right now:
Q6600 (G0) at 3.2 GHz (9x356)
Memory at 5-5-5-18
With cpu voltage at 1.2375v (bios), Prime95 25.4 ran Small FFTs for 4 hours before an error. Now I've got it running at 1.25v (bios), but it's only been running for 1 hour so far. I'm guessing that I'll end up at 1.25v or 1.2625v (going for 12 hours of prime95). Temperatures at 1.25v with prime95 running Small FFTs give 48/46/46/48 for my 4 cores (using coretemp).
1) Is 12 hours of prime 95 Small FFTs a good enough test to determine whether or not the overclock is stable?
2) When I attempt to reduce the memory timings, will I want to switch to a different test in prime95 that stresses the memory more?
3) At what point will I notice diminishing returns for real-world applications like gaming FPS? Would it be worth it to try 3.6 GHz?
4) Will running at 3.2 GHz 24/7 shorten the life of my processor?
Q6600 (G0) at 3.2 GHz (9x356)
Memory at 5-5-5-18
With cpu voltage at 1.2375v (bios), Prime95 25.4 ran Small FFTs for 4 hours before an error. Now I've got it running at 1.25v (bios), but it's only been running for 1 hour so far. I'm guessing that I'll end up at 1.25v or 1.2625v (going for 12 hours of prime95). Temperatures at 1.25v with prime95 running Small FFTs give 48/46/46/48 for my 4 cores (using coretemp).
1) Is 12 hours of prime 95 Small FFTs a good enough test to determine whether or not the overclock is stable?
2) When I attempt to reduce the memory timings, will I want to switch to a different test in prime95 that stresses the memory more?
3) At what point will I notice diminishing returns for real-world applications like gaming FPS? Would it be worth it to try 3.6 GHz?
4) Will running at 3.2 GHz 24/7 shorten the life of my processor?
