I know the difference between these, one is the oldest, in 65nm and 2x4MB of cache, while the latter have 45nm architecture and 2x6MB of L2, so they are much stronger...
What I would like to know, and couldn't find some comparison, is Q6600 overclocked at 3.2-3.6 GHz as strong as stock QX9770 at 3.2 or the slower QX9650?
I know they can easily go to 4GHz and it's hell of a speed, but I want to know, can this 250EUR processor be as fast as these 1100 EUR cousins of it, and does it mean that if I buy Q6600 and overclock it, that I get the 1000 EUR performance for 250?
EDIT: Sorry for the title, I knew they had some large numbers, but they obviously didn't get this high, so it is 9650 and 9770 I was thinking of.
What I would like to know, and couldn't find some comparison, is Q6600 overclocked at 3.2-3.6 GHz as strong as stock QX9770 at 3.2 or the slower QX9650?
I know they can easily go to 4GHz and it's hell of a speed, but I want to know, can this 250EUR processor be as fast as these 1100 EUR cousins of it, and does it mean that if I buy Q6600 and overclock it, that I get the 1000 EUR performance for 250?
EDIT: Sorry for the title, I knew they had some large numbers, but they obviously didn't get this high, so it is 9650 and 9770 I was thinking of.