Hi all! I bought q9400 last week and I've been trying different frequencies since...and voltages
I have ddr2 800 Mhz so my fsb is limited to 1600. What I came up with is that if I clock it to 3.2Ghz I have to increase cpu vcore to 1.262V in bios, (read as 1.236V), and it idles in Windows at 1.216V, full load under IBT, OCCT Linpack is 1.168V. Also I have to increase NB voltage to 1.160V... However, if I put bus to 375 (x8), I get stable 3.0Ghz@stock volts, no need to increase NB or cpu vcore. This is 100% stable with C1E and EIST enabled! Passed 8 hours OCCT on small data set, 8 hours on medium and 8 hours on Large data set. Also it passed 35 rounds of Intel Burn Test, and 2 hours OCCT Linpack. I dont plan going to 1066 ram soon so my options are either to stay on 3.0 Ghz , or clock it on 3.2... What's your opinion what should be better in real world performances, I mean games etc... BTW I used CPU-Z 1.50 to check the voltages and Core temp to monitor temps.
Should the benefit of those 200 Mhz per core be great increase or is it better to leave it on 3.0 Ghz @stock volts to run cooler.
What I also would like to know is what are your experiences with overclocking on stock volts and how far were you able to take ypur cpus @ stock?
Thanks in advance for all replays!
My config is:
Q9400 VID 1.2367V ( read as 1.204V in BIOS )
GA-EP45-DS3 F9 bios
2 GB Kingmax DDR2 800Mhz
BFG 8800 GTS 640MB OC2

Should the benefit of those 200 Mhz per core be great increase or is it better to leave it on 3.0 Ghz @stock volts to run cooler.
What I also would like to know is what are your experiences with overclocking on stock volts and how far were you able to take ypur cpus @ stock?
Thanks in advance for all replays!
My config is:
Q9400 VID 1.2367V ( read as 1.204V in BIOS )
GA-EP45-DS3 F9 bios
2 GB Kingmax DDR2 800Mhz
BFG 8800 GTS 640MB OC2