auntarie Distinguished Feb 27, 2012 736 0 19,060 Jun 1, 2012 #1 Hi all, really simple question, but I can't seem to figure it out- what is the difference between a Core 2 Quad Q9400 and a Q9400S? I've heard that the 9400s has double l2 cache, but I can't find any proof of that on the internet. Thanks.
Hi all, really simple question, but I can't seem to figure it out- what is the difference between a Core 2 Quad Q9400 and a Q9400S? I've heard that the 9400s has double l2 cache, but I can't find any proof of that on the internet. Thanks.
DJDeCiBeL Splendid Dec 3, 2010 6,060 1 27,965 Jun 1, 2012 #2 The Q9400S is 65W TDP and the Q9400 is 95W TDP. That appears to be the only difference. Q9400S http://ark.intel.com/products/40814/Intel-Core2-Quad-Processor-Q9400S-%286M-Cache-2_66-GHz-1333-MHz-FSB%29 Q9400 http://ark.intel.com/products/35365/Intel-Core2-Quad-Processor-Q9400-%286M-Cache-2_66-GHz-1333-MHz-FSB%29
The Q9400S is 65W TDP and the Q9400 is 95W TDP. That appears to be the only difference. Q9400S http://ark.intel.com/products/40814/Intel-Core2-Quad-Processor-Q9400S-%286M-Cache-2_66-GHz-1333-MHz-FSB%29 Q9400 http://ark.intel.com/products/35365/Intel-Core2-Quad-Processor-Q9400-%286M-Cache-2_66-GHz-1333-MHz-FSB%29
jsc Champion Jul 14, 2004 16,893 7 52,960 Jun 1, 2012 #3 auntarie, they both have the same 6 MB cache. The "S" model is a somewhat lower powered (65 w TDP instead of 95 watt TDP) version. Otherwise, there is no significant difference between the two.
auntarie, they both have the same 6 MB cache. The "S" model is a somewhat lower powered (65 w TDP instead of 95 watt TDP) version. Otherwise, there is no significant difference between the two.
auntarie Distinguished Feb 27, 2012 736 0 19,060 Jun 1, 2012 #4 I see. So will it be a worthwhile upgrade over my Q9300? A friend is upgrading his PC and he'll give it to me for maybe $30 or less.
I see. So will it be a worthwhile upgrade over my Q9300? A friend is upgrading his PC and he'll give it to me for maybe $30 or less.
DJDeCiBeL Splendid Dec 3, 2010 6,060 1 27,965 Jun 1, 2012 #6 auntarie : I see. So will it be a worthwhile upgrade over my Q9300? A friend is upgrading his PC and he'll give it to me for maybe $30 or less. No, not really. It's only 166Mhz faster, which you would never notice. Although for $30 or less, it's completely up to you.
auntarie : I see. So will it be a worthwhile upgrade over my Q9300? A friend is upgrading his PC and he'll give it to me for maybe $30 or less. No, not really. It's only 166Mhz faster, which you would never notice. Although for $30 or less, it's completely up to you.
auntarie Distinguished Feb 27, 2012 736 0 19,060 Jun 1, 2012 #7 Thanks. I won't bother. I was thinking it had 12 megs of cache and that's really the only reason I considered it.
Thanks. I won't bother. I was thinking it had 12 megs of cache and that's really the only reason I considered it.
B blazorthon Glorious Sep 24, 2010 14,024 19 43,265 Jun 1, 2012 #8 The 9400S is just a more power efficient version of the 9400. It is not faster at stock, although it should be better at overclocking.
The 9400S is just a more power efficient version of the 9400. It is not faster at stock, although it should be better at overclocking.