Question about FPS

[Joe_166]

i have a Amd 4300 processor
A Radeon rx 460 Graphics Card
And 8GB ram

Wondering before i buy-

I want to get Rainbow Six Siege for my pc cause i'm a fan of stealth fps games\

but i want to know how much Frames Per Seconds will i have on medium quality?

I dont care much about Graphics so its okay for medium

 

[Arkstar]

Assuming you're playing at 1080p you should be fine with that config. Medium settings is about where you will be playing rainbow six with a rx460 and FX 4300.

 

[Barty1884]

Your CPU is a little above the 'minimum', but a little shy of recommended (from an AMD standpoint, you'd be looking at an FX8XXX ideally), so that'll limit you a little.

Assuming you're only looking to play at 1080p or below.

Medium should be achievable at playable settings. I can't give you a perfect answer as far as FPS, but I'd expect playable at least - and playable generally being around 30FPS.
You might dip below that on occassion, but I'd expect you to get higher than 30FPS at times also.

 

[Arkstar]

As Barty said, the cpu is mostly the holdback, but the game will be playable at medium settings.

 

[n0ns3ns3]

adding your monitor resolution would be helpful 😉
to find your answer, look here:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/RX_460_STRIX_OC/19.html
you will get around 60FPS

 

[Barty1884]

adding your monitor resolution would be helpful 😉
to find your answer, look here:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/RX_460_STRIX_OC/19.html
you will get around 60FPS

With an i7-6700K @ 4.5GHz :lol:

That's also a 4GB version of the card, with a 2GB existing too - so that link is highly unlikely to be reflective of the OPs results.

 

[Alan_74]

you will be fine on medium aslong as ur on 1080p anything higher ud proly drop to 45-30fps

 

[n0ns3ns3]

adding your monitor resolution would be helpful 😉
to find your answer, look here:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/RX_460_STRIX_OC/19.html
you will get around 60FPS

With an i7-6700K @ 4.5GHz :lol:

That's also a 4GB version of the card, with a 2GB existing too - so that link is highly unlikely to be reflective of the OPs results.

The CPU does not play role at those "low" FPS. Anyway search for FX4300 + game name and you will get results.
I checked a video with FX4300+750ti gameplay on 1080p med settings - same 50-60 FPS.
so that's a bare minimum of what OP is going to get 😉

 

[Joe_166]

Your CPU is a little above the 'minimum', but a little shy of recommended (from an AMD standpoint, you'd be looking at an FX8XXX ideally), so that'll limit you a little.

Assuming you're only looking to play at 1080p or below.

Medium should be achievable at playable settings. I can't give you a perfect answer as far as FPS, but I'd expect playable at least - and playable generally being around 30FPS.
You might dip below that on occassion, but I'd expect you to get higher than 30FPS at times also.

Im planing on upgrading to the i5 soon do you think that'll help significantly?

And idk what my monitor is but i know the size
and thats 3440 x 1440

 

[n0ns3ns3]

^ you will have no improvement with i5 inRainbow Six Siege.
But you will be better with i5 for BF1

 

[Joe_166]

^ you will have no improvement with i5 inRainbow Six Siege.
But you will be better with i5 for BF1

Will the i7 do better?

 

[n0ns3ns3]

in Rainbow Six Siege, the CPU upgrade will not improve anything without better GPU.
with RX 460, beyond i5 like 6500 or even 6400 no CPU will improve gaming performance.

 

[Joe_166]

in Rainbow Six Siege, the CPU upgrade will not improve anything without better GPU.
with RX 460, beyond i5 like 6500 or even 6400 no CPU will improve gaming performance.

What if i upgrade to the MSI Radeon R9 390 8gb?

 

[n0ns3ns3]

than a better CPU will improve your FPS.

 

[Barty1884]

The CPU does not play role at those "low" FPS. Anyway search for FX4300 + game name and you will get results.
I checked a video with FX4300+750ti gameplay on 1080p med settings - same 50-60 FPS.
so that's a bare minimum of what OP is going to get 😉

That's not strictly true - at least, not directly.
If your GPU is maxing out ~100%, then that is correct - a better CPU isn't going to bring anything to the table.

Looking at some videos though, Rainbow Six Siege can benefit from better CPUs - when paired with the correct GPU, but you'd need to be in GTX770/970 territory before the FX4300 would become any significant bottleneck.

It appears I was a little low on my 'playable' estimate, with 750TI's seeing mid-high 50's (with dips to 30's of course) - you should realistically expect a little better with an RX460. 60's & 70's for the most part, with dips to 40's & 50's at medium setting should be realistic.

 

[n0ns3ns3]

^ In the context of the statement it was an answer to, it is entirely true. at 50-60FPS for this game, it's really not important what CPU is used to compare the GPU performance.

 

[Barty1884]

It's not as important, no - but the CPU used may well be relevant consideration.

An i7-6700K isn't going to bottleneck an RX460 in any task/game in existence.

An FX-4300 'might'. I can't say for sure, as I can't find any results with the pairing. An RX460 is a few steps above a 750TI, with an FX-4300 seeing 60-70% utilization in the game (from some benchmark & videos) with a 750TI at 100%.

While the game isn't too CPU intensive, there will be additional CPU demands to allow an RX460 to push out a higher framerate. It may or may not become a bottleneck - I doubt it would be anything significant though, even if it was.