R9 390 vs GTX 970

1440p resolution - 390 pulls ahead.
1080p - 970 has a slight advantage.

970 also eats less power, is [generally] less noisy, and runs cooler. Both are great cards, both excellent overclockers, but NVidia typically has better driver support for games that have just released.
 

hiralovesgiita

Reputable
Mar 3, 2015
16
0
4,510
As mentioned @ 1440p R9 390 is better (vram and performance)
"Bad" AMD drivers haven't been a thing for quiet some time. They're not bad, it may take a few days for drivers to come out when a new game just comes out, but that's it. And that's not too often.

My Nvidia driver fails every now and then to be honest so i'd say they both work at the same level at the moment, with Nvidia putting up drivers faster most of the time.
 

chrisp99

Reputable
Nov 24, 2015
70
0
4,630
I dont get games on the releAse day too often anyways lol. Youre right and that 8 gb vram will be nice to have in the future too. One thing, will the r9 390 run up my power bill?
 

hiralovesgiita

Reputable
Mar 3, 2015
16
0
4,510


It is only 40-80w more under load. Not much for the exchange on performance at 1440p and vram.
So no, it's pretty much just as power efficient.

EDIT: A lot of reviews are different, some are 100w, some are 60, some are 40-80... So there's no true estimate unless you test yourself I guess.
http://www.techspot.com/review/1019-radeon-r9-390x-390-380/page7.html