So I am having a dilemma:
I am building a monster computer to play VR HTC Vive and 1440p non competitive gaming.
My monitor is the Acer XG270HU 1440p 144hz FREESYNC monitor.
So now I am torn between getting the R9 Fury X for the freesync and liquid VR software advantages, or buying the Nvidia 1080 with no Freesync but still being an absolute beast of a card.
I absolutely know that the 1080 has higher framerates across the board, but believe me FPS is not everything. 60fps rendered on an SLI rig, for example, doesn't look ANYTHING (choppy, lag spikes) like 60fps rendered on a single card (smooth, fluid).
In the same manner, lets say the 1080 gets 67fps and the Fury X gets 50fps. 50fps with Freesync might be smoother than 67fps without.
As far as VR is concerned the 1080 scored a perfect 11 and the Fury X a 9.7
If you have any informed opinions please feel free to let me know. If you have never tried freesync or g-sync, don't bother posting: I can read flat numbers on the internet too 😛
Thanks!
I am building a monster computer to play VR HTC Vive and 1440p non competitive gaming.
My monitor is the Acer XG270HU 1440p 144hz FREESYNC monitor.
So now I am torn between getting the R9 Fury X for the freesync and liquid VR software advantages, or buying the Nvidia 1080 with no Freesync but still being an absolute beast of a card.
I absolutely know that the 1080 has higher framerates across the board, but believe me FPS is not everything. 60fps rendered on an SLI rig, for example, doesn't look ANYTHING (choppy, lag spikes) like 60fps rendered on a single card (smooth, fluid).
In the same manner, lets say the 1080 gets 67fps and the Fury X gets 50fps. 50fps with Freesync might be smoother than 67fps without.
As far as VR is concerned the 1080 scored a perfect 11 and the Fury X a 9.7
If you have any informed opinions please feel free to let me know. If you have never tried freesync or g-sync, don't bother posting: I can read flat numbers on the internet too 😛
Thanks!