Radeon 9600 Pro EZ? Lite?

[DesertFox]

Im thinking of gettin a Radeon 9600 Pro. Ive noticed that Sapphire and others make EZ and Lite versions. I know there has to be something different (considering the cheaper price) from these and the standard ATi pro version. Can anyone let me know what the differences. Thanks

 

[ufo_warviper]

The Sapphires are a pretty solid build if you don't plan to do any overclocking.

My OS features preemptive multitasking, a fully interactive command line, & support for 640K of RAM!

 

[coolsquirtle]

clock speed is the main difference, and make sure if it's a pro or not

RIP Block Heater....HELLO P4~~~~~
120% nVidia Fanboy
PROUD OWNER OF THE GEFORCE FX 5950ULTRA <-- I wish this was me
waiting for aBox~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

[kev]

ive got a sapphire pro lite the only difference is the software bundle you get. With the lite you just get cables,
drivers and the card. Apart from that i think its the same card as any other

 

[ad_rach]

Avoid the EZ!It is has ridiculously slow 200/400MHz memory!The Sapphire 9600 Pro Lite is a good option however as it is clocked exactly the same as the normal version.The only difference is that it comes with a smaller software bundle (i.e. no free games) and is, therefore, cheaper.

no matter how hard you try, you can't polish a turd. :]