Radeon r9 nano GeForce GTX equivalent? Is the r9 nano good for 4k gaming?

[chris3488]

Or is the 980 ti better? Or what about the Fury X?

 

[Luketheduke03]

Definitely the 980 titan. The titan has 6 GB of memory on its graphics card - making it able to do 4K Gaming - and it is SUPER powerful, don't get me wrong.

 

[BrandonYoung]

It really depends on the game, but from what I saw while checking the 980 Ti is a touch faster in most cases than the Fury X.
http://www.pcgamer.com/amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-tested-not-quite-a-980-ti-killer/

 

[dangus]

Luketheduke means the gtx 980ti. Not to be confused by the gtx titan x which is about the same performance in games but $350 more expensive

 

[dangus]

The 980ti is definitely better at that price. The nano rests in a weird price point for what it is. Which is a small form factor high performance gpu

 

[unknownofprob]

Cant recall if your referring to 980/Titan, GTX 980 Ti or GTX Titan, As there is no such thing as a 980 Titan. The statement of 6GB Video ram making it be able to do 4k gaming is controversial (sounds as if your suggesting you need 6GB), as 4GB Vram is also sufficiently capable. We all know HBM comes as an even better performer at higher resolutions, and 4k is where the sweet spot lies. The Fury X is a better option (only just in a true comparison - giving ~3fps fps leap across all games at 4k) than the Nano knowing if you can fit the radiator inside your system easily, as the R9 Nano is mainly just an underpowered version of the R9 Fury X (100W less @ 175W). That said the GTX 980Ti does give fierce competition and does in multiple cases crush the Fury/Nano. The GTX 980 Ti would be the best option for the cost.