The reason a 960 EVO which is supposedly 6x faster than a SATA drive only shaves a few seconds off load times is because the 6x speed difference is at sequential read/writes. The bottleneck is 4k read/writes, which are still far below SATA 1 speeds, much less SATA 3. They're about 30-100 MB/s. (In fact, this is where most of the speedup of a SSD over HDDs come from. HDDs only get around 1 MB/s at 4k read/writes, so SSDs are 30-100x faster. HDD sequential speeds are around 150 MB/s, so SATA SSDs are only about 4x faster.)
Very little drive activities depend on sequential read writes. Copying large files (movies, backup archives) from one SSD to another, real-time video editing, and disk benchmarks; that's about it. So unless...