ram - async vs syn

[sacrum]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

What is the best option as using non integer multiplier on amd will but into
async (Tired 0 may not be async but when ram speed is not the same as
htt-fsb)

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

U¿ytkownik "sacrum" <sacrum@clara.co.uk> napisa³:

> What is the best option as using non integer multiplier on amd will but
> into
> async (Tired 0 may not be async but when ram speed is not the same as
> htt-fsb)

WHAT?... ://

on AMD only SYNCHRO!!!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Crazy John wrote:
> U¿ytkownik "sacrum" <sacrum@clara.co.uk> napisa³:
>
>> What is the best option as using non integer multiplier on amd will
>> but into
>> async (Tired 0 may not be async but when ram speed is not the same as
>> htt-fsb)
>
> WHAT?... ://
>
> on AMD only SYNCHRO!!!

Nope, he's talking about a K8. The K8 has essentially no loss in performance
for running RAM out-of-sync with the HTT bus. So 240x10 at 6:5 (aka "166MHz
setting") will perform almost identically to 200x12 at 1:1 (aka "200MHz
setting").

--
Michael Brown
www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more
Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz ---+--- My inbox is always open

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

>> on AMD only SYNCHRO!!!
>
> Nope, he's talking about a K8. The K8 has essentially no loss in
> performance for running RAM out-of-sync with the HTT bus. So 240x10 at 6:5
> (aka "166MHz setting") will perform almost identically to 200x12 at 1:1
> (aka "200MHz setting").

i see...
then sorry i was talking about athlon and so on...

 

[sacrum]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Crazy John" <dont@likespam.pl> wrote in message
news:d35hel$jo$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl...
> >> on AMD only SYNCHRO!!!
> >
> > Nope, he's talking about a K8. The K8 has essentially no loss in
> > performance for running RAM out-of-sync with the HTT bus. So 240x10 at
6:5
> > (aka "166MHz setting") will perform almost identically to 200x12 at 1:1
> > (aka "200MHz setting").
>
> i see...
> then sorry i was talking about athlon and so on...
>
>
What about running at 11.5 x 240 - the ram will run async vs. 11 x 245 - ram
sync at 245mhz (my current setup with an 4000+