[SOLVED] RAM Performing Below Expectations - X299

[MrN1ce9uy]

Can't figure out why this system's RAM is performing below expectations. It's showing quadruple-channel enabled in BIOS and CPUID/CPU-Z.

https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/17127879

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

I actually see a lot of the X299 systems on userbenchmark showing single-core RAM performing below expectations. Why is this?

 

[DMAN999]

I would test it in AIDA64 and see what results you get.
IMO Userbenchmark results are not always accurate.

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

Good idea. I'll try later when I get home.

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

Well, this is what it got. Not sure how to compare it to other X299 systems.

Here's mine for comparison.

 

[DMAN999]

Look in the thread here:

Share your AIDA 64 cache and memory benchmark here

Hey folks, how about sharing some cache and memory benchmark you get using AIDA 64? Rules: Use the latest stable(non alpha/beta) version of AIDA(currently 4.50.3000) So here goes mine. All the best. :) Table as requested. In order of entry.... Only the best scores of an individual are...

www.techpowerup.com

 

[MrN1ce9uy]

Found an X99. I think it's pretty normal.

 

[Phaaze88]

Can't figure out why this system's RAM is performing below expectations. It's showing quadruple-channel enabled in BIOS and CPUID/CPU-Z.

https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/17127879

Out of curiosity, I went and checked it out: https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/17141477
No ram issue on my end, but it didn't properly id my 860 pro for some reason.